Literature DB >> 11838529

A genome-wide scan of 1842 DNA markers for allelic associations with general cognitive ability: a five-stage design using DNA pooling and extreme selected groups.

R Plomin1, L Hill, I W Craig, P McGuffin, S Purcell, P Sham, D Lubinski, L A Thompson, P J Fisher, D Turic, M J Owen.   

Abstract

All measures of cognitive processes correlate moderately at the phenotypic level and correlate substantially at the genetic level. General cognitive ability (g) refers to what diverse cognitive processes have in common. Our goal is to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with high g compared with average g. In order to detect QTLs of small effect size, we used extreme selected samples and a five-stage design with nominal alpha levels that permit false positive results in early stages but remove false positives in later stages. As a first step toward a systematic genome scan for allelic association, we used DNA pooling to screen 1842 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers approximately evenly spaced at 2 cM throughout the genome in a five-stage design: (1) case-control DNA pooling (101 cases with mean IQ of 136 and 101 controls with mean IQ of 100), (2) case-control DNA pooling (96 cases with IQ > 160 and 100 controls with mean IQ of 102), (3) individual genotyping of Stage 1 sample, (4) individual genotyping of Stage 2 sample, (5) transmission disequilibrium test (TDT; 196 parent-child trios for offspring with IQ > 160). The over all Type I error rate is 0.000125, which robustly protects against false positive results. The numbers of markers surviving each stage using a conservative allele-specific directional test were 108, 6, 4, 2, and 0, respectively, for the five stages. A genomic control test using DNA pooling suggested that the failure to replicate the positive case-control results in the TDT analysis was not due to ethnic stratification. Several markers that were close to significance at all stages are being investigated further. Relying on indirect association based on linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTLs means that 100,000 markers may be needed to exclude QTL associations. Because power drops off precipitously for indirect association approaches when a marker is not close to the QTL, we are not planning to genotype additional SSR markers. Instead we are using the same design to screen markers such as cSNPs and SNPs in regulatory regions that are likely to include functional polymorphisms in which the marker can be presumed to be the QTL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11838529     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013385125887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  16 in total

1.  A genomewide scan for intelligence identifies quantitative trait loci on 2q and 6p.

Authors:  Danielle Posthuma; Michelle Luciano; Eco J C de Geus; Margie J Wright; P Eline Slagboom; Grant W Montgomery; Dorret I Boomsma; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Reconsidering the heritability of intelligence in adulthood: taking assortative mating and cultural transmission into account.

Authors:  Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Sophie van der Sluis; Hermine H M Maes; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  An alternative to the search for single polymorphisms: toward molecular personality scales for the five-factor model.

Authors:  Robert R McCrae; Matthew Scally; Antonio Terracciano; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Paul T Costa
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-12

4.  Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  A G Allegrini; S Selzam; K Rimfeld; S von Stumm; J B Pingault; R Plomin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 5.  Child development and molecular genetics: 14 years later.

Authors:  Robert Plomin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-03-30

6.  The ATXN1 and TRIM31 genes are related to intelligence in an ADHD background: evidence from a large collaborative study totaling 4,963 subjects.

Authors:  Thais S Rizzi; Alejandro Arias-Vasquez; Nanda Rommelse; Jonna Kuntsi; Richard Anney; Philip Asherson; Jan Buitelaar; Tobias Banaschewski; Richard Ebstein; Dina Ruano; Sophie Van der Sluis; Christina A Markunas; Melanie E Garrett; Allison E Ashley-Koch; Scott H Kollins; Arthur D Anastopoulos; Narelle K Hansell; Margaret J Wright; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Sarah E Harris; Gail Davies; Albert Tenesa; David J Porteous; John M Starr; Ian J Deary; Beate St Pourcain; George Davey Smith; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Michael Gill; Ana Miranda; Fernando Mulas; Robert D Oades; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Joseph Sergeant; Edmund Sonuga-Barke; Hans Christoph Steinhausen; Eric Taylor; Stephen V Faraone; Barbara Franke; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 7.  The new genetics of intelligence.

Authors:  Robert Plomin; Sophie von Stumm
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  The future of genomics for developmentalists.

Authors:  Robert Plomin; Michael A Simpson
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2013-11

9.  Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood.

Authors:  Claire M A Haworth; Oliver S P Davis; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.587

10.  Genetic polymorphisms related to testosterone metabolism in intellectually gifted boys.

Authors:  Peter Celec; Denisa Tretinárová; Gabriel Minárik; Andrej Ficek; Tomáš Szemes; Silvia Lakatošová; Eva Schmidtová; Ján Turňa; Ľudevít Kádaši; Daniela Ostatníková
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.