Literature DB >> 21969232

Reconsidering the heritability of intelligence in adulthood: taking assortative mating and cultural transmission into account.

Anna A E Vinkhuyzen1, Sophie van der Sluis, Hermine H M Maes, Danielle Posthuma.   

Abstract

Heritability estimates of general intelligence in adulthood generally range from 75 to 85%, with all heritability due to additive genetic influences, while genetic dominance and shared environmental factors are absent, or too small to be detected. These estimates are derived from studies based on the classical twin design and are based on the assumption of random mating. Yet, considerable positive assortative mating has been reported for general intelligence. Unmodeled assortative mating may lead to biased estimates of the relative magnitude of genetic and environmental factors. To investigate the effects of assortative mating on the estimates of the variance components of intelligence, we employed an extended twin-family design. Psychometric IQ data were available for adult monozygotic and dizygotic twins, their siblings, the partners of the twins and siblings, and either the parents or the adult offspring of the twins and siblings (N = 1314). Two underlying processes of assortment were considered: phenotypic assortment and social homogamy. The phenotypic assortment model was slightly preferred over the social homogamy model, suggesting that assortment for intelligence is mostly due to a selection of mates on similarity in intelligence. Under the preferred phenotypic assortment model, the variance of intelligence in adulthood was not only due to non-shared environmental (18%) and additive genetic factors (44%) but also to non-additive genetic factors (27%) and phenotypic assortment (11%).This non-additive nature of genetic influences on intelligence needs to be accommodated in future GWAS studies for intelligence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969232      PMCID: PMC3276760          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-011-9507-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  28 in total

1.  Genetic structure of spatial and verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Ando; Y Ono; M J Wright
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Netherlands Twin Register: from twins to twin families.

Authors:  Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J C de Geus; Jacqueline M Vink; Janine H Stubbe; Marijn A Distel; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Danielle Posthuma; Toos C E M van Beijsterveldt; James J Hudziak; Meike Bartels; Gonneke Willemsen
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  Environmental factors determine where the Dutch live: results from the Netherlands twin register.

Authors:  Gonneke Willemsen; Danielle Posthuma; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  Familial studies of intelligence: a review.

Authors:  T J Bouchard; M McGue
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex.

Authors:  M McGue; T J Bouchard
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  The correlation between relatives with assortative mating.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Are smarter brains running faster? Heritability of alpha peak frequency, IQ, and their interrelation.

Authors:  D Posthuma; M C Neale; D I Boomsma; E J de Geus
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Flexible Mx specification of various extended twin kinship designs.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes; Michael C Neale; Sarah E Medland; Matthew C Keller; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew C Heath; Lindon J Eaves
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.587

9.  Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses.

Authors:  Karri Silventoinen; Jaakko Kaprio; Eero Lahelma; Richard J Viken; Richard J Rose
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

10.  Hereditary influences on cognitive functioning in older men. A study of 4000 twin pairs.

Authors:  J Brandt; K A Welsh; J C Breitner; M F Folstein; M Helms; J C Christian
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  17 in total

1.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  What Makes a Partner Ideal, and for Whom? Compatibility Tests, Filter Tests, and the Mating Stability Matrix.

Authors:  Lorenza Lucchi Basili; Pier Luigi Sacco
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-02

3.  Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts.

Authors:  Biyao Wang; Jessie R Baldwin; Tabea Schoeler; Rosa Cheesman; Wikus Barkhuizen; Frank Dudbridge; David Bann; Tim T Morris; Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Copy number variations and cognitive phenotypes in unselected populations.

Authors:  Katrin Männik; Reedik Mägi; Aurélien Macé; Ben Cole; Anna L Guyatt; Hashem A Shihab; Anne M Maillard; Helene Alavere; Anneli Kolk; Anu Reigo; Evelin Mihailov; Liis Leitsalu; Anne-Maud Ferreira; Margit Nõukas; Alexander Teumer; Erika Salvi; Daniele Cusi; Matt McGue; William G Iacono; Tom R Gaunt; Jacques S Beckmann; Sébastien Jacquemont; Zoltán Kutalik; Nathan Pankratz; Nicholas Timpson; Andres Metspalu; Alexandre Reymond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence.

Authors:  Eva Krapohl; Kaili Rimfeld; Nicholas G Shakeshaft; Maciej Trzaskowski; Andrew McMillan; Jean-Baptiste Pingault; Kathryn Asbury; Nicole Harlaar; Yulia Kovas; Philip S Dale; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Thinking positively: The genetics of high intelligence.

Authors:  Nicholas G Shakeshaft; Maciej Trzaskowski; Andrew McMillan; Eva Krapohl; Michael A Simpson; Avi Reichenberg; Martin Cederlöf; Henrik Larsson; Paul Lichtenstein; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2015-01

7.  Common DNA markers can account for more than half of the genetic influence on cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Robert Plomin; Claire M A Haworth; Emma L Meaburn; Thomas S Price; Oliver S P Davis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  No effect of genome-wide copy number variation on measures of intelligence in a New Zealand birth cohort.

Authors:  Andrew T M Bagshaw; L John Horwood; Youfang Liu; David M Fergusson; Patrick F Sullivan; Martin A Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic influences are virtually absent for trust.

Authors:  Paul A M Van Lange; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings.

Authors:  R Plomin; I J Deary
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.