Literature DB >> 3057694

The relationship between cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters and subsequent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

B L Kasiske1, K Heim-Duthoy, K V Rao, W M Awni.   

Abstract

The best approach to determining the optimal dose of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients is unclear. In this prospective investigation, CsA pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 45 patients 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the initiation of CsA. Data from 104 studies were then combined to analyze the relationship between CsA kinetic parameters and posttransplant clinical events. Random trough levels, used in the day-to-day adjustment of CsA dose, were examined separately in 19 of the 45 study patients. All CsA levels were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. Results showed: (1) trough CsA levels, obtained by random sampling, or from the kinetic studies, correlated poorly with dose; however, there was a good correlation between CsA dose and maximum concentration (Cmax, r = .39, P less than .001), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC, r = .45, P less than .001), and terminal elimination half-life (r = .43, P less than .001); (2) several pharmacokinetic parameters correlated with subsequent rejection episodes; patients with acute rejection within 2 or 4 weeks after study had 15-31% lower Cmax (P less than .05) and 13-19% lower AUC (P less than .05) compared to those who were rejection-free; and (3) levels of blood constituents known to bind CsA also correlated with rejection, and this correlation was independent of the impact of kinetic parameters on rejection. Altogether, these results suggested that a limited number of CsA pharmacokinetic studies may be more useful than multiple, random trough levels in monitoring CsA therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3057694     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198811000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacodynamic monitoring of cyclosporin.

Authors:  W M Awni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Optimisation of immunosuppressive therapy using pharmacokinetic principles.

Authors:  J Grevel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Authors:  Frédéric Leger; Jean Debord; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau; Mathias Büchler; Gérard Lachâtre; Gilles Paintaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A prospective study of cyclosporine concentration in relation to its therapeutic effect and toxicity after renal transplantation.

Authors:  A Lindholm; R Dahlqvist; G G Groth; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients.

Authors:  R J Dumont; M H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporin--an update.

Authors:  A Lindholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Genetic and clinical determinants of early, acute calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity: results from a kidney transplant consortium.

Authors:  Pamala A Jacobson; David Schladt; Ajay Israni; William S Oetting; Yi Cheng Lin; Robert Leduc; Weihau Guan; Vishal Lamba; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  A review of assay methods for cyclosporin. Clinical implications.

Authors:  K T Kivistö
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica E Ericson; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Daniel Gonzalez; Chiara Melloni; Jeffrey T Guptill; Kevin D Hill; Huali Wu; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.