Literature DB >> 2223423

A prospective study of cyclosporine concentration in relation to its therapeutic effect and toxicity after renal transplantation.

A Lindholm1, R Dahlqvist, G G Groth, F Sjöqvist.   

Abstract

1. Cyclosporine (CsA) concentrations in plasma and whole blood were monitored prospectively in 66 consecutive kidney transplant recipients for 6 months after transplantation or until graft loss. Immunosuppression was based on treatment with CsA and prednisolone in 27 patients and CsA, azathioprine and prednisolone in 39 patients. 2. Whole blood and plasma samples (separated at 37 degrees C) were collected 10-12 h after CsA dosage twice weekly over the first 3 months and thereafter once weekly. CsA concentrations were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.) in plasma, by specific and non-specific monoclonal radioimmunoassays (r.i.a.) in whole blood, and by polyclonal r.i.a. and polyclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (f.p.i.a.) in whole blood and plasma. 3. There were no differences between the treatment schedules regarding graft or patient survival, occurrence of acute rejection, nephrotoxicity or infection. 4. CsA concentrations were significantly lower at the time of acute rejection than one week earlier based on all of the analytical methods used except f.p.i.a. 5. The lowest CsA concentration, recorded during the first month after transplantation, was significantly lower in patients with than in patients without experience of acute rejection episodes when the CsA concentrations were measured by polyclonal r.i.a. in whole blood and plasma and by specific and non-specific monoclonal r.i.a. in whole blood, but not by h.p.l.c. in plasma or polyclonal f.p.i.a. in whole blood or plasma. 6. The highest CsA concentration recorded during the second post-transplantation month, was higher in patients with acute nephrotoxicity than in those without nephrotoxicity when CsA was measured by specific monoclonal r.i.a. in whole blood (471 +/- 409 ng ml-1 vs 327 +/- 150 ng ml-1, P less than 0.05), but not by the other methods. 7. The mean plasma h.p.l.c. concentration of CsA measured by h.p.l.c. during the first month after transplantation was significantly higher in patients who suffered from systemic infection than in patients who did not (116 +/- 70 ng ml-1 vs 82 +/- 52 ng ml-1; P less than 0.05). 8. Thus, significant relationships between CsA concentrations and clinical events were apparent using assay methods specific for CsA as well as using polyclonal r.i.a., but not using polyclonal f.p.i.a. When h.p.l.c. was used, however, plasma drug concentrations were often below the limit of determination. Our results suggest that specific analysis of CsA in whole blood allows the best distinction between patients who respond favourably and less favourably to treatment with CsA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2223423      PMCID: PMC1368148          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03796.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  32 in total

1.  Blood cyclosporin concentrations and renal allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  D W Holt; J T Marsden; A Johnston; M Bewick; D H Taube
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-25

Review 2.  Metabolism of cyclosporine.

Authors:  G Maurer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Cyclosporin blood levels do correlate with clinical complications.

Authors:  E Irschik; H Tilg; D Niederwieser; G Gastl; C Huber; R Margreiter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Changing route of cyclosporin administration: need for close monitoring.

Authors:  J H Glerum; D J Zachariasse; A van Dijk; R F Jessurun
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-06-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The value of serial serum trough cyclosporine levels in human renal transplantation.

Authors:  B D Kahan; C A Wideman; M Reid; S Gibbons; M Jarowenko; S Flechner; C T Van Buren
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin A in bone marrow transplantation patients.

Authors:  P Bertault-Pérès; D Maraninchi; Y Carcassonne; J P Cano; J Barbet
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Immunological and pharmacological monitoring in the clinical use of cyclosporin A.

Authors:  P A Keown; C R Stiller; R A Ulan; N R Sinclair; W J Wall; G Carruthers; W Howson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A radioimmunoassay to measure cyclosporin A in plasma and serum samples.

Authors:  P Donatsch; E Abisch; M Homberger; R Traber; M Trapp; R Voges
Journal:  J Immunoassay       Date:  1981

9.  Cyclosporine plasma levels in renal transplant patients. Association with renal toxicity and allograft rejection.

Authors:  G Klintmalm; J Säwe; O Ringdén; C von Bahr; A Magnusson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Evaluation of fluorescence polarization immunoassay for determination of cyclosporin in plasma.

Authors:  Y Hayashi; N Shibata; T Minouchi; H Shibata; T Ono; H Shimakawa
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs.

Authors:  A Johnston; D W Holt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S M Tsunoda; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Authors:  Frédéric Leger; Jean Debord; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau; Mathias Büchler; Gérard Lachâtre; Gilles Paintaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Monitoring of the free concentration of cyclosporine in plasma in man.

Authors:  A Lindholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporin--an update.

Authors:  A Lindholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Genetic and clinical determinants of early, acute calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity: results from a kidney transplant consortium.

Authors:  Pamala A Jacobson; David Schladt; Ajay Israni; William S Oetting; Yi Cheng Lin; Robert Leduc; Weihau Guan; Vishal Lamba; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  A review of assay methods for cyclosporin. Clinical implications.

Authors:  K T Kivistö
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  A review on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs.

Authors:  Niloufar Mohammadpour; Sepideh Elyasi; Naser Vahdati; Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Jamal Shamsara
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.699

9.  Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Maciej Nowacki; Łukasz Nazarewski; Tomasz Kloskowski; Dominik Tyloch; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Katarzyna Pietkun; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Janusz Tyloch; Samy L Habib; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Clinical pharmacology in Stockholm 50 years-report from the jubilee symposium.

Authors:  Michel Eichelbaum; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Folke Sjöqvist
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.