Literature DB >> 17429747

Use of cross-species in-situ hybridization (ZOO-FISH) to assess chromosome abnormalities in day-6 in-vivo- or in-vitro-produced sheep embryos.

Gianfranco Coppola1, Basil Alexander, Dino Di Berardino, Elizabeth St John, Parvathi K Basrur, W Allan King.   

Abstract

Causes of chromosomal differences such as mosaicism between embryos developed in vivo and in vitro may be resolved using animal models to compare embryos generated in vivo with those generated by different production systems. The aims of this study were: (1) to test a ZOO-FISH approach (using bovine painting probes) to detect abnormal chromosome make-up in the sheep embryo model, and (2) to examine the extent of chromosome deviation in sheep embryos derived in vivo and in vitro. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on day 6 in-vivo and in-vitro derived sheep embryos using commercially available bovine chromosome painting probes for sex chromosomes X-Y and autosomes 1-29. A total of 8631 interphase and metaphase nuclei were analyzed from 49 in-vitro-derived and 51 in-vivo-derived embryos. The extent of deviation from normal ovine chromosome make-up was higher (p < 0.05) in in-vitro-produced embryos relative to in-vivo-derived embryos (65.3% vs. 19.6% respectively) mainly due to diploid-polyploid mosaicism. Polyploid cells ranged from 3n to 8 n with tetraploids most predominant among non-diploid cells. The proportions of polyploid cells per mixoploid embryo in in-vitro-produced embryos ranged from 1.4% to 30.3%, in contrast to less than 10% among the in-vivo-derived embryos. It was concluded that in-vitro-derived embryos are vulnerable to ploidy change compared to their in-vivo counterparts. The application of ZOO-FISH to domestic animal embryos is an effective approach to study the chromosome complement of species for which DNA probes are unavailable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17429747     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1125-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  48 in total

1.  Chromosome aberrations in in vitro-produced bovine embryos at days 2-5 post-insemination.

Authors:  D Viuff; T Greve; B Avery; P Hyttel; P B Brockhoff; P D Thomsen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Restricted distribution of tetraploid cells in mouse tetraploid<==>diploid chimaeras.

Authors:  R M James; A H Klerkx; M Keighren; J H Flockhart; J D West
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Confirmation of diagnosis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) through blastocyst culture: preliminary experience.

Authors:  A Veiga; Y Gil; M Boada; M Carrera; F Vidal; I Boiso; Y Ménézo; P N Barri
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  FISH analysis on day 5 post-insemination of human arrested and blastocyst stage embryos.

Authors:  P Ruangvutilert; J D Delhanty; P Serhal; M Simopoulou; C H Rodeck; J C Harper
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Numerical chromosomal abnormalities in equine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  B P B Rambags; P J Krijtenburg; H F van Drie; G Lazzari; C Galli; P L Pearson; B Colenbrander; T A E Stout
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Chromosome elimination in micronuclei: a common cause of hypoploidy.

Authors:  J H Ford; C J Schultz; A T Correll
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Polyploid cells in blastocysts and early fetuses from Australian Merino sheep.

Authors:  J D Murray; C Moran; M P Boland; C D Nancarrow; R Sutton; R M Hoskinson; R J Scaramuzzi
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1986-11

9.  Comparison of RBG-banded karyotypes of cattle, sheep, and goats.

Authors:  H Hayes; E Petit; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1991

10.  Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Josien G Derhaag; Edith Coonen; Marijke Bras; J Marij Bergers Janssen; Rosie Ignoul-Vanvuchelen; Joep P M Geraedts; Johannes L H Evers; John C M Dumoulin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

1.  A high incidence of chromosome abnormalities in two-cell stage porcine IVP embryos.

Authors:  Miroslav Hornak; Michal Jeseta; Sarka Hanulakova; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Aneuploidy detection in pigs using comparative genomic hybridization: from the oocytes to blastocysts.

Authors:  Miroslav Hornak; Eva Oracova; Pavlina Hulinska; Leona Urbankova; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Preimplantation chromosomal mosaics, chimaeras and confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  John D West; Clare A Everett
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.