Literature DB >> 11820703

Studies on the feasibility of a subretinal visual prosthesis: data from Yucatan micropig and rabbit.

H N Schwahn1, F Gekeler, K Kohler, K Kobuch, H G Sachs, F Schulmeyer, W Jakob, V P Gabel, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To estimate the feasibility of the subretinal concept of a visual prosthesis, animal models and prototypes, each representing a certain aspect of the final prosthesis, were utilised to test for requirements for such a medical device: (1) the ability to elicit--by electrical stimulation--event-related central activity in the central visual system, and (2) the long-term biocompatibility and biostability of the implant within the subretinal space.
METHODS: (1) In rabbit and Yucatan minipig, cortical evoked potentials were recorded with chronically implanted epidural electrodes during stimulation with light flashes as well as during electrical stimulation in the subretinal space. Voltage pulses ranging from -3 V to +3 V were applied via an acutely implanted electrode array on a wired prototype. (2) For biocompatibility studies a silicon-based micro-photodiode array (MPDA) was used that closely resembled the design and composition of the final prosthesis. Fourteen months after implantation, angiography was performed and the histological findings of the retina in the immediate vicinity of the implant were evaluated.
RESULTS: (1) In both rabbit and minipig, subretinal electrical stimulation resulted in evoked cortical potentials that were comparable to visual evoked potentials. The lowest threshold levels for the subretinal stimulation were 0.6 V for rabbits and 2 V for minipigs. (2) Long-term stability of an implanted MPDA and its biocompatibility were proven for a postoperative period of 14 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Data from animal experiments with certain prototypes of the final prosthesis suggest the feasibility of the concept of a subretinal visual prosthesis: Both requirements were met: (1) the functioning of the subretinal stimulation and (2) the biocompatibility of the MPDA implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11820703     DOI: 10.1007/s004170100368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of subretinally implanted microphotodiode arrays in cats by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography.

Authors:  Michael Völker; Kei Shinoda; Helmut Sachs; Helmut Gmeiner; Thorsten Schwarz; Konrad Kohler; Werner Inhoffen; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Eberhart Zrenner; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Direct stimulation of optic nerve by electrodes implanted in optic disc of rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Fang; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Takashi Fujikado; Makoto Osanai; Hiroyuki Kanda; Yasushi Ikuno; Motohiro Kamei; Masahito Ohji; Dekang Gan; Junsub Choi; Tetsuya Yagi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations.

Authors:  J Salzmann; O P Linderholm; J-L Guyomard; M Paques; M Simonutti; M Lecchi; J Sommerhalder; E Dubus; M Pelizzone; D Bertrand; J Sahel; P Renaud; A B Safran; S Picaud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview].

Authors:  F Gekeler; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Electrophysiological and histological studies of chronically implanted intrapapillary microelectrodes in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Fang; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Takashi Fujikado; Makoto Osanai; Yasushi Ikuno; Motohiro Kamei; Masahito Ohji; Tetsuya Yagi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  [Epiretinal visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter; W Mokwa
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Effects of subretinal implant materials on the viability, apoptosis and barrier function of cultured RPE cells.

Authors:  Hui-Juan Wu; Xiao-Xin Li; Jian-Qiang Dong; Wei-Hua Pei; Hong-Da Chen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.

Authors:  Liming Li; Pengjia Cao; Mingjie Sun; Xinyu Chai; Kaijie Wu; Xun Xu; Xiaoxin Li; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.