Literature DB >> 11816614

Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients.

S Ahmed1, F G Shellock.   

Abstract

The potential bioeffects associated with magnetic resonance (MR) procedures result from exposure to the static, gradient, and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Each electromagnetic field represents a possible health risk at sufficiently high levels of exposure. The presence of certain biomedical implants and devices may pose hazards for patients undergoing MR procedures. Additionally, other safety issues must be considered for patients in the MR environment. This review article discusses the bioeffects of MR exposures and provides an overview of safety considerations, with an emphasis on information pertinent to cardiovascular patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11816614     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-100107466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.

Authors:  C Kupfahl; M Honold; G Meinhardt; H Vogelsberg; A Wagner; H Mahrholdt; U Sechtem
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Perspectives for preventive screening with total body MRI.

Authors:  Susanne C Ladd; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes with cardiac MRI: comparison between two semiautomated quantitative software packages.

Authors:  G Messalli; A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; S Seitun; A Aldrovandi; M Imbriaco; M Salvatore; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Ensuring safety of implanted devices under MRI using reversed RF polarization.

Authors:  William R Overall; John M Pauly; Pascal P Stang; Greig C Scott
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason W Curtis; Donna C Lesniak; James H Wible; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

Authors:  D Haghi; T Suselbeck; S Fluechter; G Kalmar; M Schroder; J J Kaden; T Poerner; M Borggrefe; T Papavassiliu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  MR-based full-body preventative cardiovascular and tumor imaging: technique and preliminary experience.

Authors:  Mathias Goyen; Susanne C Goehde; Christoph U Herborn; Peter Hunold; Florian M Vogt; Elke R Gizewski; Thomas C Lauenstein; Waleed Ajaj; Michael Forsting; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Clinical safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jérôme Jehl; Alexandre Comte; Sébastien Aubry; Nicolas Meneveau; François Schiele; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.