Literature DB >> 11804427

Prospective randomized comparison of ovarian blockade with nafarelin versus leuprolide during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in an ICSI program.

J G Franco1, R L Baruffi, A L Mauri, C G Petersen, J E Chufallo, V Felipe, E Garbellini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to compare the efficiency of ovarian blockade with nafarelin versus leuprolide in a population whose indication for assisted reproduction was the male factor
METHODS: A total of 238 patients were assigned at random to two types of treatment: Group I (119 aspirations), nafarelin (Synarel, Searle), 200 microg by the nasal route twice a day, and Group II (119 aspirations), leuprolide acetate (Lupron, Abbott), 0.5 mg by the subcutaneous route once a day. Both types of blockade were started during the 2nd phase (21st day of the menstrual cycle) and were continued until the day of HCG (5,000-10,000 IU). All patients received a fixed dose of recombinant FSH for 7 days and on the 8th day of stimulation the doses started to be adapted according to ovarian response.
RESULTS: Patients' age did not differ (p = 0.93) between Group 1 (34.1 +/- 3.79) and Group II (34 +/- 4.64). The number of oocytes retrieved from Group I (10.5 +/- 5.93) was also similar (p = 0.57) to that retrieved from Group II (10.2 +/- 6.36). In addition, there was no difference (p = 0.58) in the number of oocytes retrieved at Metaphase II between Group I (8.2 +/- 4.61) and Group II (7.9 +/- 5.2). Fertilization rates and embryo scores were similar (p = 0.81 and p = 0.25, respectively) for Group I (67.5% +/- 21.3 and 34.4% +/- 14.4) and Group II (68.1% +/- 23and32.2% +/- 14.7, respectively). Inaddition, pregnancy rates per puncture and per embryo transfer and implantation rates were similar for Group I (30.2, 31.3, and 16.2%, respectively) then compared with Group 11(24.4, 25.2, and 12.6%, respectively) (p = 0.38, p = 0.37, and p = 0.22, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation and pregnancy rates per puncture and per embryo transfer are not statistically significant in the nafarelin group when compared with leuprolide group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11804427      PMCID: PMC3455697          DOI: 10.1023/a:1013108921427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of three gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  T Dada; O Salha; H S Baillie; V Sharma
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Comparison of buserelin and nafarelin in IVF cycles and in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  N Simberg; M Tulppala; L M Husa; A Tiitinen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  A double-blind comparison of nafarelin and leuprolide acetate for down-regulation in IVF cycles.

Authors:  S L Corson; J N Gutmann; F R Batzer; B Gocial
Journal:  Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

4.  Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  L G Westergaard; S B Laursen; C Y Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  A prospective and randomized study of ovarian stimulation for ICSI with recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH.

Authors:  J G Franco; R L Baruffi; J Coelho; A L Mauri; C G Petersen; E Garbellini
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins.

Authors:  J B Oliveira; R L Baruffi; A L Mauri; C G Petersen; M C Borges; J G Franco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The choice of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog influences outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  M C Martin; C R Givens; E D Schriock; R H Glass; P V Dandekar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Nafarelin versus leuprolide in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A S Penzias; F N Shamma; J N Gutmann; E E Jones; A H DeCherney; G Lavy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Comparison between nafarelin and leuprolide acetate for in vitro fertilization: preliminary clinical study.

Authors:  Z N Dantas; M Vicino; J P Balmaceda; R H Asch; S C Stone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  A prospective randomized single-blind comparative trial of nafarelin acetate with buserelin in long-protocol gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue controlled in-vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  G M Lockwood; S M Pinkerton; D H Barlow
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of vaginal progesterone administration starting on the day of oocyte retrieval on pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Ricardo Baruffi; Ana Lucia Mauri; Claudia Guilhermino Petersen; Valéria Felipe; José Gonçalves Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers.

Authors:  Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Claudia Petersen; João Batista Alcantara Oliveira; Paula Contart; Anagloria Pontes; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Intranasal drug delivery: opportunities and toxicologic challenges during drug development.

Authors:  Lea-Adriana Keller; Olivia Merkel; Andreas Popp
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.