Literature DB >> 10783342

Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction.

L G Westergaard1, S B Laursen, C Y Andersen.   

Abstract

The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10783342     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  48 in total

1.  Improved pregnancy rates with luteinizing hormone supplementation in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Authors:  Nicole D Paterson; Shu C Foong; Calvin A Greene
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-agonist protocol: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Batista A Oliveira; Ana Lucia Mauri; Claudia G Petersen; Anice M C Martins; João Cornicelli; Mario Cavanha; Anagloria Pontes; Ricardo L R Baruffi; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Cesare Aragona; Renzo Gaglione; Helmy Selman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Prospective randomized comparison of ovarian blockade with nafarelin versus leuprolide during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in an ICSI program.

Authors:  J G Franco; R L Baruffi; A L Mauri; C G Petersen; J E Chufallo; V Felipe; E Garbellini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  The role of luteinizing hormone activity in controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  N Angelopoulos; A Goula; G Tolis
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Assessing predictors for the success of GnRH antagonist protocol in reproductive women in IVF/ICSI - in fresh cycles.

Authors:  An-Cong Wang; Ying Wang; Feng-Xia Wu; Dong-Yi Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-09-14

8.  Mild/minimal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation of patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  L Rinaldi; F Lisi; H Selman
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Adverse Reproductive and Developmental Health Outcomes Following Prenatal Exposure to a Hydraulic Fracturing Chemical Mixture in Female C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; John J Bromfield; Kara C Klemp; Chun-Xia Meng; Andrew Wolfe; R Thomas Zoeller; Victoria D Balise; Chiamaka J Isiguzo; Donald E Tillitt; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  Lutropin alpha, recombinant human luteinizing hormone, for the stimulation of follicular development in profoundly LH-deficient hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women: a review.

Authors:  Bernd Th Krause; Ralf Ohlinger; Annette Haase
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.