Literature DB >> 15035552

Effects of vaginal progesterone administration starting on the day of oocyte retrieval on pregnancy rates.

Ricardo Baruffi1, Ana Lucia Mauri, Claudia Guilhermino Petersen, Valéria Felipe, José Gonçalves Franco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vaginal progesterone administration starting on the day of oocyte retrieval induced a decrease in uterine contraction frequency on the day of embryo transfer (ET) as compared with preovulatory values. Uterine relaxation before ET is likely to improve outcome by avoiding displacement of the embryo from the uterine cavity (Fanchin, Righini, de Ziegler, Oliviennes, Ledée, Frydman: Fertil Steril 2001;75:1136-1140). The objective of the present study was to determine whether the early use of vaginal progesterone on the day of oocyte retrieval may alter the embryo implantation and pregnancy rates.
METHODS: A total of 103 patients were submitted for ovarian stimulation with GnRH-a and recombinant FSH (Puregon, Organon) for the application of invasive assisted reproduction techniques (ICSI). The patients were divided into two groups in a prospective and randomized manner: Group A (n = 51) where application of vaginal progesterone started (Utrogestan, Besins International) at the dose of 400 mg from the evening of the day of oocyte retrieval, and Group B (n = 52) started to apply vaginal progesterone at the same dose but from the evening of embryo transfer (2nd day).
RESULTS: The age of Group A patients (34.2 +/- 4.6) was similar (p = 0.50) to that of Group B patients (34.8 +/- 4.9). The number of oocytes retrieved and at metaphase II from Group A patients (10.6 +/- 6.9 and 7.8 +/- 6.0; respectively) did not differ significantly (p = 0.84 and p = 0.49, respectively) from the number of oocytes retrieved and metaphase II from Group B patients (10 +/- 5.6 and 6.7 +/- 4.7, respectively). Also, there was no difference (p = 0.48) in number of embryos transferred to Group A patients (2.7 +/- 0.8) versus Group B patients (2.7 +/- 0.9). Embryo implantation and pregnancy rates for Group A patients (12.6 and 27.4%, respectively) were equal (p = 0.98 and p = 1.0, respectively) to those for Group B patients (13.4 and 28.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Vaginal progesterone at the dose of 400 mg started on the day of oocyte retrieval did not increase implantation or pregnancy rates when compared to the same dose started on the day of embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15035552      PMCID: PMC3455305          DOI: 10.1023/b:jarg.0000013653.54830.2c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  7 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparison of ovarian blockade with nafarelin versus leuprolide during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in an ICSI program.

Authors:  J G Franco; R L Baruffi; A L Mauri; C G Petersen; J E Chufallo; V Felipe; E Garbellini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Administration of progesterone before oocyte retrieval negatively affects the implantation rate.

Authors:  S H Sohn; A S Penzias; A M Emmi; A K Dubey; L C Layman; R H Reindollar; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Use of Crinone vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  S J Chantilis; K M Zeitoun; S I Patel; D A Johns; V A Madziar; D D McIntire
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Hormonal influence on the uterine contractility during ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  R Fanchin; J M Ayoubi; F Olivennes; C Righini; D de Ziegler; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effects of vaginal progesterone administration on uterine contractility at the time of embryo transfer.

Authors:  R Fanchin; C Righini; D de Ziegler; F Olivennes; N Ledée; R Frydman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Factors of importance for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for male infertility.

Authors:  P Svalander; A S Forsberg; A H Jakobsson; M Wikland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  R Fanchin; C Righini; F Olivennes; S Taylor; D de Ziegler; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.918

  7 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Steven L Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Administration of progesterone on the day of oocyte retrieval to reverse accumulation of fluid in the endometrial cavity during assisted reproductive techniques.

Authors:  Mario Cavagna; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; João Batista A Oliveira; Ricardo R L Baruffi; José G Franco
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2014-12-27

Review 4.  The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Ru Liu; Hua-Qiao Mu; Qi Shi; Xiao-Qiu Xiao; Hong-Bo Qi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.

Authors:  H M Fatemi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

6.  A 10-year follow-up on the practice of luteal phase support using worldwide web-based surveys.

Authors:  Gon Shoham; Milton Leong; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Christopher A Jones; Kevin Doody; Russell Foulk; Bill Yee; G David Adamson; Barbara Cometti; Gary DeVane; Gary Hubert; Silvia Trevisan; Fred Hoehler; Clarence Jones; Michael Soules
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the effects of nifedipine on embryo transfer: Study protocol.

Authors:  Kelvin Kl Ng; Genia Rozen; Tanya Stewart; Franca Agresta; Alex Polyakov
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.

Authors:  Federica Di Guardo; Habib Midassi; Annalisa Racca; Herman Tournaye; Michel De Vos; Christophe Blockeel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Does nifedipine improve outcomes of embryo transfer?: Interim analysis of a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Kelvin Kwok Lap Ng; Genia Rozen; Tanya Stewart; Franca Agresta; Alex Polyakov
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.