Literature DB >> 15085906

Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients?

Chris Blanchard1, David Feeny, Jeffrey L Mahon, Robert Bourne, Cecil Rorabeck, Larry Stitt, Susan Webster-Bogaert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to examine the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HU12) and Mark 3 (HU13) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) needing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
BACKGROUND: One hundred and fourteen OA patients (mean age = 69.2; SD = 8.9) who were waiting to see a surgeon for an evaluation for THA completed baseline measures that included the HU12, HU13, SF-36, Harris Hip Scale, WOMAC, MACTAR, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the 6-min walk test.
METHODS: We examined 87 a priori hypotheses by correlating (one-tailed zero-order correlations) the single-attribute utility scores for the pain, emotion, mobility, ambulation, self-care, dexterity, vision, hearing, and speech attributes of the HU12 and HU13 and the overall HU12 and HU13 utility scores to specified subscales of the other measures.
RESULTS: The zero-order correlations confirmed 75% of our a priori hypotheses suggesting that the constructs within the HU12 and HU13 were, in general, related to similar constructs in other measures as expected.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that HU12 and HU13 are valid for use in OA and THA studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085906     DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018479.52075.bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

1.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D H Feeny; W J Furlong; R D Barr; Y Zhang; Q Wang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team.

Authors:  J I Williams; H Llewellyn Thomas; R Arshinoff; N Young; C D Naylor
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  N Bellamy
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; L B Berman; M Townsend; S O Pugsley; L W Chambers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Mahon; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; David H Feeny; Larry Stitt; Susan Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  In the queue for total joint replacement: patients' perspectives on waiting times. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; R Arshinoff; M Bell; J I Williams; C D Naylor
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States.

Authors:  D A Revicki; D Osoba; D Fairclough; I Barofsky; R Berzon; N K Leidy; M Rothman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

View more
  10 in total

1.  Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Steven Tally; Ron D Hays; David Feeny; Theodore G Ganiats; Mari Palta; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  David Feeny; Lieling Wu; Ken Eng
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Standard error of measurement of 5 health utility indexes across the range of health for use in estimating reliability and responsiveness.

Authors:  Mari Palta; Han-Yang Chen; Robert M Kaplan; David Feeny; Dasha Cherepanov; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  The construct validity of the health utilities index mark 3 in assessing health status in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David Feeny; Sunita Ghosh; Ronald G Nador; Justin Weinkauf; Kathleen Jackson; Marianne Schafenacker; Dalyce Zuk; Grace Hubert; Dale Lien
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  The construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 in assessing mental health in population health surveys.

Authors:  David Feeny; Nathalie Huguet; Bentson H McFarland; Mark S Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Construct validity for the Health Utilities Index in a sleep center.

Authors:  Kevin C Welch; Steven M Scharf
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis.

Authors:  Dennis G Fryback; Mari Palta; Dasha Cherepanov; Daniel Bolt; Jee-Seon Kim
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: a study of the reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in patients sustaining trauma.

Authors:  Max W de Graaf; Inge Hf Reininga; Klaus W Wendt; Erik Heineman; Mostafa El Moumni
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Lucy Busija; Richard H Osborne; Anna Nilsdotter; Rachelle Buchbinder; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.