PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to (a) assess the feasibility of administering ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743), a novel DNA minor-groove disrupting agent of marine origin, administered as a daily i.v. infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks; (b) recommend a dose for Phase II studies; (c) characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior; and (d) seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of ET-743 as a daily 1-h i.v. infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine were sampled on both days 1 and 5 of the first course. Pharmacokinetic parameters were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated with 118 courses of ET-743 at doses ranging from 6 to 380 microg/m(2)/day. Elevations in hepatic transaminases were common at ET-743 dose levels > or =216 microg/m(2)/day, resolved rapidly, and were never dose limiting nor cumulative. Instead, hematological toxicity was the principal toxicity that precluded dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose of ET-743 that could be administered repetitively was 325 microg/m(2)/day. Antitumor activity was noted in three patients with leiomyosarcoma and primary peritoneal and ovarian carcinomas. The pharmacokinetics of ET-743 were dose independent, and drug accumulation over the 5 days of treatment was modest, with the ratio of the area under the plasma-versus-time curve on day 5 to that on day 1 averaging 2.05. The volume of distribution at steady state was large (mean, 1037 liters/m(2)), and the mean terminal half life on day 5 was 26.81 h. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of ET-743 that can be administered repetitively is 325 microg/m(2)/day daily x 5 every 3 weeks, which is recommended for disease-directed clinical trials. The acceptable toxicity profile of ET-743 on the divided-dose schedule evaluated in this trial, as well as the generally superior antitumor activity associated with divided-dose schedules in preclinical studies, provides a rationale for further evaluation of ET-743 on this administration schedule.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to (a) assess the feasibility of administering ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743), a novel DNA minor-groove disrupting agent of marine origin, administered as a daily i.v. infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks; (b) recommend a dose for Phase II studies; (c) characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior; and (d) seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of ET-743 as a daily 1-h i.v. infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine were sampled on both days 1 and 5 of the first course. Pharmacokinetic parameters were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated with 118 courses of ET-743 at doses ranging from 6 to 380 microg/m(2)/day. Elevations in hepatic transaminases were common at ET-743 dose levels > or =216 microg/m(2)/day, resolved rapidly, and were never dose limiting nor cumulative. Instead, hematological toxicity was the principal toxicity that precluded dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose of ET-743 that could be administered repetitively was 325 microg/m(2)/day. Antitumor activity was noted in three patients with leiomyosarcoma and primary peritoneal and ovarian carcinomas. The pharmacokinetics of ET-743 were dose independent, and drug accumulation over the 5 days of treatment was modest, with the ratio of the area under the plasma-versus-time curve on day 5 to that on day 1 averaging 2.05. The volume of distribution at steady state was large (mean, 1037 liters/m(2)), and the mean terminal half life on day 5 was 26.81 h. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of ET-743 that can be administered repetitively is 325 microg/m(2)/day daily x 5 every 3 weeks, which is recommended for disease-directed clinical trials. The acceptable toxicity profile of ET-743 on the divided-dose schedule evaluated in this trial, as well as the generally superior antitumor activity associated with divided-dose schedules in preclinical studies, provides a rationale for further evaluation of ET-743 on this administration schedule.
Authors: Lia Gore; E Rivera; M Basche; S L Moulder-Thompson; J Li; S Eppers; S Grolnic; C O'Bryant; D Cleere; Y A Elsayed; S G Eckhardt Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: J H Beumer; J M Rademaker-Lakhai; H Rosing; L Lopez-Lazaro; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Luis Paz-Ares; Antonio López-Pousa; Andrés Poveda; Carmen Balañá; Eva Ciruelos; Joaquim Bellmunt; Javier García del Muro; Mariano Provencio; Antonio Casado; Fernando Rivera-Herrero; Miguel Angel Izquierdo; Antonio Nieto; Adnan Tanović; Hernán Cortes-Funes; José María Buesa Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Margaret von Mehren; Michael Bookman; Neal J Meropol; Louis M Weiner; Eric Sherman; Jinhui Li; Roland Knoblauch; Trilok Parekh; Roger B Cohen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo; Peter Zannikos; Sarapee Hirankarn; Kim Stuyckens; Elizabeth A Ludwig; Arturo Soto-Matos; Luis Lopez-Lazaro; Joel S Owen Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2007 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: M von Mehren; R J Schilder; J D Cheng; E Temmer; T M Cardoso; F G Renshaw; E Bayever; P Zannikos; Z Yuan; R B Cohen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jean-Yves Blay; Margaret von Mehren; Brian L Samuels; Michael P Fanucchi; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Brigid Buckley; Leen Gilles; Claudia Lebedinsky; Yusri A Elsayed; Axel Le Cesne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wells A Messersmith; Antonio Jimeno; David Ettinger; Dan Laheru; Julie Brahmer; Dina Lansey; Yasmin Khan; Ross C Donehower; Yusri Elsayed; Peter Zannikos; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 3.333