BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions, and effect on liver histology of trabectedin in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Entry criteria for the 36 patients included normal liver function, prior doxorubicin exposure <250 mg/m(2), and normal cardiac function. A 1-h PLD (30 mg/m(2)) infusion was followed immediately by one of six trabectedin doses (0.4, 0.6, 0.75, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 mg/m(2)) infused over 3 h, repeated every 21 days until evidence of complete response (CR), disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Plasma samples were obtained to assess PK profiles. RESULTS: The MTD of trabectedin was 1.1 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (31%) and elevated transaminases (31%). Six patients responded (one CR, five partial responses), with an overall response rate of 16.7%, and 14 had stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) >4 months (39%). Neither drug had its PK affected significantly by concomitant administration compared with trabectedin and PLD each given as a single agent. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin combined with PLD is generally well tolerated at therapeutic doses of both drugs in pretreated patients with diverse tumor types and appears to provide clinical benefit. These results support the need for additional studies of this combination in appropriate cancer types.
BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions, and effect on liver histology of trabectedin in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Entry criteria for the 36 patients included normal liver function, prior doxorubicin exposure <250 mg/m(2), and normal cardiac function. A 1-h PLD (30 mg/m(2)) infusion was followed immediately by one of six trabectedin doses (0.4, 0.6, 0.75, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 mg/m(2)) infused over 3 h, repeated every 21 days until evidence of complete response (CR), disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Plasma samples were obtained to assess PK profiles. RESULTS: The MTD of trabectedin was 1.1 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (31%) and elevated transaminases (31%). Six patients responded (one CR, five partial responses), with an overall response rate of 16.7%, and 14 had stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) >4 months (39%). Neither drug had its PK affected significantly by concomitant administration compared with trabectedin and PLD each given as a single agent. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin combined with PLD is generally well tolerated at therapeutic doses of both drugs in pretreated patients with diverse tumor types and appears to provide clinical benefit. These results support the need for additional studies of this combination in appropriate cancer types.
Authors: M Minuzzo; S Marchini; M Broggini; G Faircloth; M D'Incalci; R Mantovani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-06-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C van Kesteren; E Cvitkovic; A Taamma; L López-Lázaro; J M Jimeno; C Guzman; R A Math t; J H Schellens; J L Misset; E Brain; M J Hillebrand; H Rosing; J H Beijnen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Delaloge; A Yovine; A Taamma; M Riofrio; E Brain; E Raymond; P Cottu; F Goldwasser; J Jimeno; J L Misset; M Marty; E Cvitkovic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D P Ryan; J G Supko; J P Eder; M V Seiden; G Demetri; T J Lynch; A J Fischman; J Davis; J Jimeno; J W Clark Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Taamma; J L Misset; M Riofrio; C Guzman; E Brain; L Lopez Lazaro; H Rosing; J M Jimeno; E Cvitkovic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I Judson; J A Radford; M Harris; J Y Blay; Q van Hoesel; A le Cesne; A T van Oosterom; M J Clemons; C Kamby; C Hermans; J Whittaker; E Donato di Paola; J Verweij; S Nielsen Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Loretta Lau; Jeffery G Supko; Susan Blaney; Linda Hershon; Nita Seibel; Mark Krailo; Wenchun Qu; David Malkin; Jose Jimeno; Mark Bernstein; Sylvain Baruchel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marilena Di Napoli; Chiara Della Pepa; Laura Arenare; Giovanni Scambia; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi; Gabriella Ferrandina; Vanda Salutari; Roberto Sorio; Anna Maria Mosconi; Giorgia Mangili; Lucia Borgato; Stefano Lepori; Angela Salvino; Sandro Pignata; Sabrina Chiara Cecere Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Margaret von Mehren; Michael Bookman; Neal J Meropol; Louis M Weiner; Eric Sherman; Jinhui Li; Roland Knoblauch; Trilok Parekh; Roger B Cohen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Marcy A Mitchell; Jay E Johnson; Kara Pascarelli; Neil Beeharry; Maria Chiourea; Sarantis Gagos; Dina Lev; Margaret von Mehren; David Kipling; Dominique Broccoli Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Philippe A Cassier; Aude Duret; Olivier Trédan; Nicolas Carrabin; Pierre Méeus; Isabelle Treilleux; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Isabelle Ray-Coquard Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 3.989