PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of trabectedin plus gemcitabine administered on a weekly schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 and adequate organ function were enrolled. On days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received gemcitabine (starting dose, 800 mg/m(2)) followed by trabectedin (starting dose, 0.3 mg/m(2)). Strict liver function test treatment criteria were employed to avoid hepatic toxicity seen in previous trabectedin studies. Plasma samples were collected during cycles 1 and 2 for pharmacokinetic analyses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received >or=1 dose, with a median of two treatment cycles (range 1-10). The most common drug-related toxicity was hepatic. Dose reductions were required for trabectedin in four (27%) patients and gemcitabine in six (40%) patients. Cycle delays/dose holds were required in 11 (73%) patients and doses above trabectedin 0.4 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), which is the recommended phase II dose, were not feasible. Seven patients maintained stable disease after two cycles. Gemcitabine and trabectedin pharmacokinetics were not altered substantially with concomitant administration. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction and potential efficacy of trabectedin and gemcitabine combination therapy, further study is warranted with alternate schedules.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of trabectedin plus gemcitabine administered on a weekly schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS:Patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 and adequate organ function were enrolled. On days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received gemcitabine (starting dose, 800 mg/m(2)) followed by trabectedin (starting dose, 0.3 mg/m(2)). Strict liver function test treatment criteria were employed to avoid hepatic toxicity seen in previous trabectedin studies. Plasma samples were collected during cycles 1 and 2 for pharmacokinetic analyses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received >or=1 dose, with a median of two treatment cycles (range 1-10). The most common drug-related toxicity was hepatic. Dose reductions were required for trabectedin in four (27%) patients and gemcitabine in six (40%) patients. Cycle delays/dose holds were required in 11 (73%) patients and doses above trabectedin 0.4 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), which is the recommended phase II dose, were not feasible. Seven patients maintained stable disease after two cycles. Gemcitabine and trabectedin pharmacokinetics were not altered substantially with concomitant administration. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction and potential efficacy of trabectedin and gemcitabine combination therapy, further study is warranted with alternate schedules.
Authors: Naoto Takahashi; WeiWei Li; Debabrata Banerjee; Yongbiao Guan; Yasuko Wada-Takahashi; Murray F Brennan; Ting-Chao Chou; Kathleen W Scotto; Joseph R Bertino Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: G Valoti; M I Nicoletti; A Pellegrino; J Jimeno; H Hendriks; M D'Incalci; G Faircloth; R Giavazzi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R Garcia-Carbonero; J G Supko; J Manola; M V Seiden; D Harmon; D P Ryan; M T Quigley; P Merriam; J Canniff; G Goss; U Matulonis; R G Maki; T Lopez; T A Puchalski; M A Sancho; J Gomez; C Guzman; J Jimeno; G D Demetri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caroline Laverdiere; E Anders Kolb; Jeffrey G Supko; Richard Gorlick; Paul A Meyers; Robert G Maki; Leonard Wexler; George D Demetri; John H Healey; Andrew G Huvos; Allen M Goorin; Rochelle Bagatell; Ana Ruiz-Casado; Cecilia Guzman; Jose Jimeno; David Harmon Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Yovine; M Riofrio; J Y Blay; E Brain; J Alexandre; C Kahatt; A Taamma; J Jimeno; C Martin; Y Salhi; E Cvitkovic; J L Misset Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas A Puchalski; David P Ryan; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; George D Demetri; Leah Butkiewicz; David Harmon; Michael V Seiden; Robert G Maki; Luis Lopez-Lazaro; Jose Jimeno; Cecilia Guzman; Jeffrey G Supko Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2002-07-31 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Sarah Donald; Richard D Verschoyle; Peter Greaves; Timothy W Gant; Tina Colombo; Marco Zaffaroni; Roberta Frapolli; Massimo Zucchetti; Maurizio D'Incalci; Daniela Meco; Riccardo Riccardi; Luis Lopez-Lazaro; Jose Jimeno; Andreas J Gescher Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lia Gore; E Rivera; M Basche; S L Moulder-Thompson; J Li; S Eppers; S Grolnic; C O'Bryant; D Cleere; Y A Elsayed; S G Eckhardt Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Margaret von Mehren; Michael Bookman; Neal J Meropol; Louis M Weiner; Eric Sherman; Jinhui Li; Roland Knoblauch; Trilok Parekh; Roger B Cohen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Philippe A Cassier; Aude Duret; Olivier Trédan; Nicolas Carrabin; Pierre Méeus; Isabelle Treilleux; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Isabelle Ray-Coquard Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 3.989