OBJECTIVE: To characterise the population pharmacokinetics of trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis(R)) in cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 603 patients (945 cycles) receiving intravenous trabectedin as monotherapy at doses ranging from 0.024 to 1.8 mg/m(2) and given as a 1-, 3- or 24-hour infusion every 21 days; a 1- or 3-hour infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle; or a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days were included in the analysis. An open four-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination, linear and nonlinear distribution to the deep and shallow peripheral compartments, respectively, and a catenary compartment off the shallow compartment was developed to best describe the index dataset using NONMEM V software. The effect of selected patient covariates on trabectedin pharmacokinetics was investigated. Model evaluation was performed using goodness-of-fit plots and relative error measurements for the test dataset. Simulations were undertaken to evaluate covariate effects on trabectedin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The mean (SD) trabectedin elimination half-life was approximately 180 (61.4) hours. Plasma accumulation was limited when trabectedin was given every 3 weeks. Systemic clearance (31.5 L/h, coefficient of variation 51%) was 19.2% higher in patients receiving concomitant dexamethasone. The typical values of the volume of distribution at steady state for male and female patients were 6070L and 5240L, respectively. Within the range studied, age, body size variables, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, albumin, total protein, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and presence of liver metastases were not statistically related to trabectedin pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of trabectedin were consistent across the infusion durations and dose regimens evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of trabectedin pharmacokinetic data demonstrated linear elimination, dose-proportionality up to 1.8 mg/m(2) and time-independent pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic impact of dexamethasone and sex covariates is probably limited given the moderate to large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of trabectedin. The antiemetic and hepatoprotective effects are still a valid rationale to recommend dexamethasone as a supportive treatment for trabectedin.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the population pharmacokinetics of trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis(R)) in cancerpatients. METHODS: A total of 603 patients (945 cycles) receiving intravenous trabectedin as monotherapy at doses ranging from 0.024 to 1.8 mg/m(2) and given as a 1-, 3- or 24-hour infusion every 21 days; a 1- or 3-hour infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle; or a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days were included in the analysis. An open four-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination, linear and nonlinear distribution to the deep and shallow peripheral compartments, respectively, and a catenary compartment off the shallow compartment was developed to best describe the index dataset using NONMEM V software. The effect of selected patient covariates on trabectedin pharmacokinetics was investigated. Model evaluation was performed using goodness-of-fit plots and relative error measurements for the test dataset. Simulations were undertaken to evaluate covariate effects on trabectedin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The mean (SD) trabectedin elimination half-life was approximately 180 (61.4) hours. Plasma accumulation was limited when trabectedin was given every 3 weeks. Systemic clearance (31.5 L/h, coefficient of variation 51%) was 19.2% higher in patients receiving concomitant dexamethasone. The typical values of the volume of distribution at steady state for male and female patients were 6070L and 5240L, respectively. Within the range studied, age, body size variables, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, albumin, total protein, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and presence of liver metastases were not statistically related to trabectedin pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of trabectedin were consistent across the infusion durations and dose regimens evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of trabectedin pharmacokinetic data demonstrated linear elimination, dose-proportionality up to 1.8 mg/m(2) and time-independent pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic impact of dexamethasone and sex covariates is probably limited given the moderate to large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of trabectedin. The antiemetic and hepatoprotective effects are still a valid rationale to recommend dexamethasone as a supportive treatment for trabectedin.
Authors: Esther F A Brandon; Rolf W Sparidans; Kees-Jan Guijt; Sjoerd Löwenthal; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: H Rosing; M J Hillebrand; J M Jimeno; A Gómez; P Floriano; G Faircloth; R E Henrar; J B Vermorken; E Cvitkovic; A Bult; J H Beijnen Journal: J Mass Spectrom Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 1.982
Authors: F Grosso; P Dileo; R Sanfilippo; S Stacchiotti; R Bertulli; C Piovesan; J Jimeno; M D'Incalci; A Gescher; P G Casali Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Loretta Lau; Jeffery G Supko; Susan Blaney; Linda Hershon; Nita Seibel; Mark Krailo; Wenchun Qu; David Malkin; Jose Jimeno; Mark Bernstein; Sylvain Baruchel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Twelves; K Hoekman; A Bowman; J B Vermorken; A Anthoney; J Smyth; C van Kesteren; J H Beijnen; J Uiters; J Wanders; J Gomez; C Guzmán; J Jimeno; A Hanauske Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: E Izbicka; R Lawrence; E Raymond; G Eckhardt; G Faircloth; J Jimeno; G Clark; D D Von Hoff Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: L van Andel; S Fudio; H Rosing; S Munt; B Miguel-Lillo; I González; M M Tibben; N de Vries; A H M de Vries Schultink; J H M Schellens; J H Beijnen Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Luis Paz-Ares; Antonio López-Pousa; Andrés Poveda; Carmen Balañá; Eva Ciruelos; Joaquim Bellmunt; Javier García del Muro; Mariano Provencio; Antonio Casado; Fernando Rivera-Herrero; Miguel Angel Izquierdo; Antonio Nieto; Adnan Tanović; Hernán Cortes-Funes; José María Buesa Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: R Thertulien; G M Manikhas; L Y Dirix; J B Vermorken; K Park; M M Jain; J J Jiao; J Natarajan; T Parekh; P Zannikos; A P Staddon Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Federica Grosso; Maurizio D'Incalci; Mirela Cartoafa; Antonio Nieto; Carlos Fernández-Teruel; Vicente Alfaro; Pilar Lardelli; Elena Roy; Javier Gómez; Carmen Kahatt; Arturo Soto-Matos; Ian Judson Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-04-07 Impact factor: 3.333