Literature DB >> 11796825

Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Swen Wessendorf1, Björn Fritz, Gunnar Wrobel, Michelle Nessling, Stefan Lampel, Daniel Göettel, Manfred Küepper, Stefan Joos, Ton Hopman, Felix Kokocinski, Hartmut Döhner, Martin Bentz, Carsten Schwäenen, Peter Lichter.   

Abstract

Genome-wide screening for chromosomal imbalances using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) revealed a wealth of data on previously unrecognized tumor-specific genomic alterations. CGH to microarrays of DNA, an approach termed matrix-CGH, allows detection of genomic imbalances at a much higher resolution. We show that matrix CGH is also feasible from small tissue samples requiring universal amplification of genomic DNA. Because widespread application of matrix-CGH experiments using large numbers of DNA targets demands a high degree of automation, we have developed a protocol for a fully automated procedure. The use of specialized instrumentation for the generation of DNA chips, their hybridization, scanning, and evaluation required numerous alterations and modifications of the initial protocol. We here present the elaboration and testing of automated matrix-CGH. A chip consisting of 188 different genomic DNA fragments, cloned in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) or P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC) vectors and immobilized in replicas of 10, was used to assess the performance of the automated protocol in determining the gene dosage variations in tumor cell lines COLO320-HSR, HL60, and NGP. Although ratios of matrix-CGH were highly concordant with results of chromosomal CGH (85%), the dynamic range of the matrix-CGH ratios was highly superior. Investigation of the two amplicons on 8q24 in COLO320-HSR and HL60, containing the MYC gene, revealed a homogeneous amplicon in COLO320-HSR but a heterogeneous amplification pattern in HL60 cells. Although control clones for normalization of the signal ratios can be predicted in cases with defined chromosomal aberrations, in primary tumors such data are often not available, requiring alternative normalization algorithms. Testing such algorithms in a primary high-grade B-cell lymphoma, we show the feasibility of this approach. With the matrix-CGH protocol presented here, robust and reliable detection of genomic gains and losses is accomplished in an automated fashion, which provides the basis for widespread application in tumor and clinical genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11796825     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3780394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  16 in total

1.  Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations.

Authors:  Carsten Schwaenen; Michelle Nessling; Swen Wessendorf; Tatjana Salvi; Gunnar Wrobel; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Hans A Kestler; Christian Haslinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Martin Bentz; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Expressive genomic hybridisation: gene expression profiling at the cytogenetic level.

Authors:  F Al-Mulla; M Al-Maghrebi; G Varadharaj
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-08

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of genomic disorders and chromosome abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Francesca Gullotta; Michela Biancolella; Elena Costa; Isabella Colapietro; Anna Maria Nardone; Paolo Molinaro; Adalgisa Pietropolli; Marianovella Narcisi; Cristiana Di Rosa; Giuseppe Novelli
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-01

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Pamela L Paris; Donna G Albertson; Janneke C Alers; Armann Andaya; Peter Carroll; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay N Jain; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Daniel Pinkel; Fritz H Schröder; Kees J Vissers; Vivienne J E Watson; Mark F Wildhagen; Colin Collins; Herman Van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Sensitivity and resistance towards isoliquiritigenin, doxorubicin and methotrexate in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cell lines by pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Mahmoud Youns; Yu-Jie Fu; Yuan-Gang Zu; Anne Kramer; V Badireenath Konkimalla; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Holger Sültmann; Thomas Efferth
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Effects of ozone exposure during microarray posthybridization washes and scanning.

Authors:  Steve Byerly; Kyle Sundin; Rajiv Raja; Jim Stanchfield; Bassem A Bejjani; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Analysis of chromosome-11 aberrations in pulmonary and gastrointestinal carcinoids: an array comparative genomic hybridization-based study.

Authors:  Susanna Petzmann; Reinhard Ullmann; Iris Halbwedl; Helmut H Popper
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-07-03       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  [CUP syndrome: molecular pathogenesis and biology].

Authors:  A Krämer; S Gattenlöhner; K Neben
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Chromosomal localization of DNA amplifications in neuroblastoma tumors using cDNA microarray comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ben Beheshti; Ilan Braude; Paula Marrano; Paul Thorner; Maria Zielenska; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.