Literature DB >> 19767590

Effects of ozone exposure during microarray posthybridization washes and scanning.

Steve Byerly1, Kyle Sundin, Rajiv Raja, Jim Stanchfield, Bassem A Bejjani, Lisa G Shaffer.   

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the clinical laboratory necessitates the implementation of quality control measures to attain accurate results with a high level of confidence. Environmental ozone is present in all industrialized cities and has been found to be detrimental to array data even at levels considered acceptable by US Environmental Protection Agency standards. In this study, we characterized the effect of ozone on microarray data on three different labeling platforms that use different fluorescent dyes (Cy3 and Cy5, Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647, and Alexa Fluor 3 and Alexa Fluor 5) that are commonly used in array-based comparative genomic hybridization. We investigated the effects of ozone on microarray data by washing the array in variable ozone environments. In addition, we observed the effects of prolonged exposure to ozone on the microarray after washing in an ozone-free environment. Our results demonstrate the necessity of minimizing ozone exposure when washing and drying the microarray. We also found that washed microarrays produce the best results when immediately scanned; however, if a low-ozone environment is maintained, there will be little compromise in the data collected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767590      PMCID: PMC2765759          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.090009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  8 in total

1.  Molecular karyotyping: array CGH quality criteria for constitutional genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris R Vermeesch; Cindy Melotte; Guy Froyen; Steven Van Vooren; Binita Dutta; Nicole Maas; Stefan Vermeulen; Björn Menten; Frank Speleman; Bart De Moor; Paul Van Hummelen; Peter Marynen; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Koen Devriendt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalities.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Arthur L Beaudet; Arthur R Brothman; Betsy Hirsch; Brynn Levy; Christa Lese Martin; James T Mascarello; Kathleen W Rao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?

Authors:  Bassem A Bejjani; Reza Saleki; Blake C Ballif; Emily A Rorem; Kyle Sundin; Aaron Theisen; Catherine D Kashork; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas.

Authors:  G Hodgson; J H Hager; S Volik; S Hariono; M Wernick; D Moore; N Nowak; D G Albertson; D Pinkel; C Collins; D Hanahan; J W Gray
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Swen Wessendorf; Björn Fritz; Gunnar Wrobel; Michelle Nessling; Stefan Lampel; Daniel Göettel; Manfred Küepper; Stefan Joos; Ton Hopman; Felix Kokocinski; Hartmut Döhner; Martin Bentz; Carsten Schwäenen; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Effects of atmospheric ozone on microarray data quality.

Authors:  Thomas L Fare; Ernest M Coffey; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Deborah A Kessler; Kristopher A Kilian; John E Koch; Eric LeProust; Matthew J Marton; Michael R Meyer; Roland B Stoughton; George Y Tokiwa; Yanqun Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Elimination of laboratory ozone leads to a dramatic improvement in the reproducibility of microarray gene expression measurements.

Authors:  William S Branham; Cathy D Melvin; Tao Han; Varsha G Desai; Carrie L Moland; Adam T Scully; James C Fuscoe
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.563

8.  Expanding the clinical phenotype of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome and characterization of the reciprocal microduplication.

Authors:  Blake C Ballif; Aaron Theisen; Justine Coppinger; Gordon C Gowans; Joseph H Hersh; Suneeta Madan-Khetarpal; Karen R Schmidt; Raymond Tervo; Luis F Escobar; Christopher A Friedrich; Marie McDonald; Lindsey Campbell; Jeffrey E Ming; Elaine H Zackai; Bassem A Bejjani; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 2.009

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Tourette syndrome: gene expression as a tool to discover drug targets.

Authors:  Isaac H Liao; Frank R Sharp
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Gene expression profiling of mouse embryos with microarrays.

Authors:  Alexei A Sharov; Yulan Piao; Minoru S H Ko
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  miRNA profiles of monocyte-lineage cells are consistent with complicated roles in HIV-1 restriction.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sisk; Janice E Clements; Kenneth W Witwer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Custom Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization: the Importance of DNA Quality, an Expert Eye, and Variant Validation.

Authors:  Francesca Lantieri; Michela Malacarne; Stefania Gimelli; Giuseppe Santamaria; Domenico Coviello; Isabella Ceccherini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.