Literature DB >> 11785828

Fundamental precision limitations for measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter: applications in tissue-mimicking phantoms and trabecular bone.

K A Wear1.   

Abstract

Various models for ultrasonic scattering from trabecular bone have been proposed. They may be evaluated to a certain extent by comparison with experimental measurements. In order to appreciate limitations of these comparisons, it is important to understand measurement precision. In this article, an approach proposed by Lizzi and co-workers is adapted to model precision of estimates of frequency-dependent backscatter for scattering targets (such as trabecular bone) that contain many scatterers per resolution cell. This approach predicts uncertainties in backscatter due to the random nature of the interference of echoes from individual scatterers as they are summed at the receiver. The model is validated in experiments on a soft-tissue-mimicking phantom and on 24 human calcaneus samples interrogated in vitro. It is found that while random interference effects only partially explain measured variations in the magnitude of backscatter, they are virtually entirely responsible for observed variations in the frequency dependence (exponent of a power law fit) of backscatter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11785828      PMCID: PMC8217734          DOI: 10.1121/1.1416907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone.

Authors:  B K Hoffmeister; S A Whitten; J Y Rho
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation from human calcaneus: implications for relative roles of absorption and scattering in determining attenuation.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone.

Authors:  C F Njeh; R Hodgskinson; J D Currey; C M Langton
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  The elastic properties of hard tissues and apatites.

Authors:  D E Grenoble; J L Katz; K L Dunn; K L Murty; R S Gilmore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1972-05

5.  Quantitative relationship between tissue composition and scattering of ultrasound.

Authors:  C M Sehgal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone.

Authors:  C M Langton; S B Palmer; R W Porter
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1984-04

7.  Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density.

Authors:  A M Schott; S Weill-Engerer; D Hans; F Duboeuf; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Osteoporosis: association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; D C Bauer; K Stone; A Pressman; A Mathur; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone.

Authors:  P Droin; G Berger; P Laugier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  11 in total

1.  The dependence of ultrasonic backscatter on trabecular thickness in human calcaneus: theoretical and experimental results.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Andres Laib
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effect of intervening tissues on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of bone: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Ultrasonic scattering from cancellous bone: a review.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.

Authors:  Wu Liu; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Timothy J Hall; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Characterization of trabecular bone using the backscattered spectral centroid shift.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Frequency dependence of backscatter from thin, oblique, finite-length cylinders measured with a focused transducer-with applications in cancellous bone.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.