Literature DB >> 7816765

Comparison of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics using clinical bioequivalence data and Monte Carlo simulations.

A A el-Tahtawy1, A J Jackson, T M Ludden.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative performance and usefulness of single dose (SD) and multiple dose (MD) regimens for bioequivalence (BE) determination. Drugs such as indomethacin, procainamide, erythromycin, quinidine, nifedipine were tested for BE under SD and MD dose regimens. Drugs characterized by low accumulation indices (AI) showed virtually no change in the 90% confidence interval (CI) of AUC and CMAX upon multiple dosing. On the other hand, drugs with higher AI appeared to have smaller CI at steady-state. For example, the CI range of AUC and CMAX of quinidine (AI of 1.54) decreased from 26 to 12 and from 22 to 12, respectively, upon multiple dosing. A Monte Carlo simulation study of SD and MD bioequivalence trials was performed. The probability of failing the bioequivalence test was evaluated for several situations defined by different levels of variability and correlation in ka constants, presence or absence of inter- and/or intra-individual variability in clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V), and different degrees of accumulation. All the possible combinations of these factors were tested with SD and MD study designs. All simulations used 1000 data sets with 30 subjects in each data set for a total of 144 unique designs (total of 144,000 simulations of bioequivalence trials). Upon multiple dosing, narrowing of CI ranges was observed for drugs simulated to have high AI high variability and a large difference in absorption constants (ka) between test and reference formulations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7816765     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018906931100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

2.  Prediction of steady-state bioequivalence relationships using single dose data I-linear kinetics.

Authors:  A J Jackson
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.627

3.  Generic drugs and the prescribing physician.

Authors:  S L Nightingale; J C Morrison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Controversy. II: Bioequivalence as an indicator of therapeutic equivalence: modeling the theoretic influence of bioinequivalence on single-dose drug effect.

Authors:  S C Olson; M A Eldon; R D Toothaker; J J Ferry; W A Colburn
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Bioequivalence: performance of several measures of rate of absorption.

Authors:  F Y Bois; T N Tozer; W W Hauck; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic evaluation of flutamide in normal geriatric volunteers.

Authors:  E Radwanski; G Perentesis; S Symchowicz; N Zampaglione
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etintidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S M Huang; T B Marriott; H S Weintraub; J D Arnold; J Boccagno; R Abels; W Harris
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of nilvadipine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Terakawa; Y Tokuma; N Kuwahara; A Shishido; H Noguchi
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.126

  8 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Bioavailability and bioequivalence: an FDA regulatory overview.

Authors:  M L Chen; V Shah; R Patnaik; W Adams; A Hussain; D Conner; M Mehta; H Malinowski; J Lazor; S M Huang; D Hare; L Lesko; D Sporn; R Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Laszlo Endrenyi; Alfredo Garcia Arieta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Evaluation of a Cmin and a normalized Cmin method for the confirmation of steady-state in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  A J Jackson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs using clinical trial simulations. II: Comparison of single and multiple-dose trials using AUC and Cmax.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; T N Tozer; F Harrison; L Lesko; R Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Drug interactions at the renal level. Implications for drug development.

Authors:  P L Bonate; K Reith; S Weir
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Aspects of Oral Modified-Release Drug Products.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Dale P Conner; Bing V Li
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  The Two Main Goals of Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Henning H Blume; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Bioequivalence requirements in the European Union: critical discussion.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Arieta; John Gordon
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs using Monte Carlo simulations. I. Estimation of rate of absorption for single and multiple dose trials using Cmax.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; A J Jackson; T M Ludden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.200

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.