Literature DB >> 26002510

Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US, EU, Brazil, China, and India.

Sau L Lee1, Bhawana Saluja, Alfredo García-Arieta, Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos, Ying Li, Sarah Lu, Shuguang Hou, Juliet Rebello, Abhijit Vaidya, Jaideep Gogtay, Shrinivas Purandare, Svetlana Lyapustina.   

Abstract

This article describes regulatory approaches for approval of "generic" orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) in the United States, European Union, Brazil, China and India. While registration of a generic OIDP in any given market may require some documentation of the formulation and device similarity to the "original" product as well as comparative testing of in vitro characteristics and in vivo performance, the specific documentation approaches, tests and acceptance criteria vary by the country. This divergence is due to several factors, including unique cultural, historical, legal and economic circumstances of each region; the diverse healthcare and regulatory systems; the different definitions of key terms such as "generic" and "reference" drug; the acknowledged absence of in vitro in vivo correlations for OIDPs; and the scientific and statistical issues related to OIDP testing (such as how best to account for the batch-to-batch variability of the Reference product, whether to use average bioequivalence or population bioequivalence in the statistical analysis of results, whether to use healthy volunteers or patients for pharmacokinetic studies, and which pharmacodynamic or clinical end-points should be used). As a result of this discrepancy, there are ample opportunities for the regulatory and scientific communities around the world to collaborate in developing more consistent, better aligned, science-based approaches. Moving in that direction will require both further research and further open discussion of the pros and cons of various approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002510      PMCID: PMC4540743          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9787-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  35 in total

1.  Effects of device and formulation on in vitro performance of dry powder inhalers.

Authors:  Wallace P Adams; Sau L Lee; Robert Plourde; Robert A Lionberger; Craig M Bertha; William H Doub; Jean-Marc Bovet; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Equivalence considerations for orally inhaled products for local action-ISAM/IPAC-RS European Workshop report.

Authors:  Carole Evans; David Cipolla; Tim Chesworth; Eva Agurell; Richard Ahrens; Dale Conner; Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Myrna Dolovich; William Doub; Anders Fuglsang; Afredo García Arieta; Michael Golden; Robert Hermann; Günther Hochhaus; Susan Holmes; Paul Lafferty; Svetlana Lyapustina; Parameswaran Nair; Dennis O'Connor; David Parkins; Ilse Peterson; Colin Reisner; Dennis Sandell; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Marjolein Weda; Patricia Watson
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.849

3.  Establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products.

Authors:  Peter T Daley-Yates; David A Parkins
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.648

4.  Effect of device design on the in vitro performance and comparability for capsule-based dry powder inhalers.

Authors:  Jagdeep Shur; Sau Lee; Wallace Adams; Robert Lionberger; James Tibbatts; Robert Price
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids. New developments.

Authors:  P J Barnes; S Pedersen; W W Busse
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  A sensitivity analysis of the modified chi-square ratio statistic for equivalence testing of aerodynamic particle size distribution.

Authors:  Benjamin Weber; Sau L Lee; Robert Lionberger; Bing V Li; Yi Tsong; Guenther Hochhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients.

Authors:  M Palmqvist; T Ibsen; A Mellén; J Lötvall
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Effect of inhaled steroids on airway hyperresponsiveness, sputum eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with asthma.

Authors:  E L van Rensen; K C Straathof; M A Veselic-Charvat; A H Zwinderman; E H Bel; P J Sterk
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Indian study on epidemiology of asthma, respiratory symptoms and chronic bronchitis in adults (INSEARCH).

Authors:  S K Jindal; A N Aggarwal; D Gupta; R Agarwal; R Kumar; T Kaur; K Chaudhry; B Shah
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Effect of differing doses of inhaled budesonide on markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma.

Authors:  A Jatakanon; S Kharitonov; S Lim; P J Barnes
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Scientific Rationale for Determining the Bioequivalence of Inhaled Drugs.

Authors:  Omar S Usmani; Mathieu Molimard; Vaibhav Gaur; Jaideep Gogtay; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Geena Malhotra; Eric Derom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Generic Complex Drug Products Containing Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Nan Zheng; Dajun D Sun; Peng Zou; Wenlei Jiang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: Overview of the IPAC-RS/University of Florida Orlando Inhalation Conference.

Authors:  Guenther Hochhaus; Craig Davis-Cutting; Martin Oliver; Sau L Lee; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Bioequivalence Evaluations of Generic Dry Powder Inhaler Drug Products: Similarities and Differences Between Japan, USA, and the European Union.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuribayashi; Toru Yamaguchi; Hanaka Sako; Tomoko Takishita; Kazunori Takagi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Particle size and gastrointestinal absorption influence tiotropium pharmacokinetics: a pilot bioequivalence study of PUR0200 and Spiriva HandiHaler.

Authors:  Jason Perry; Brian Trautman; Joe Takher-Smith; Steve Kramer; Katie Kane; Michael Silverman; Lisa Tan; Scott Haughie; Wolfram Richter; Valentin Kirkov; Sacha Arsova; Jonathan Ward; David L Hava
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  In Silico Methods for Development of Generic Drug-Device Combination Orally Inhaled Drug Products.

Authors:  Ross L Walenga; Andrew H Babiskin; Liang Zhao
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 7.  Review of Drug Development Guidance to Treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: US and EU Perspectives.

Authors:  Aernout van Haarst; Lorcan McGarvey; Sabina Paglialunga
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  The Role of ICS/LABA Fixed-Dose Combinations in the Treatment of Asthma and COPD: Bioequivalence of a Generic Fluticasone Propionate-Salmeterol Device.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Jill A Ohar; Arkady Koltun; Richard Allan; Jonathan K Ward
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic variability confounds current bioequivalence regulations: A dry powder inhaler randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E Burmeister Getz; K J Carroll; B Jones; L Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Between-Batch Bioequivalence (BBE): a Statistical Test to Evaluate In Vitro Bioequivalence Considering the Between-Batch Variability.

Authors:  Jonathan Bodin; Stéphanie Liandrat; Gabriel Kocevar; Céline Petitcolas
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.