Literature DB >> 15568890

Biowaivers for oral immediate-release products: implications of linear pharmacokinetics.

Fried Faassen1, Herman Vromans.   

Abstract

Bioequivalence of drug formulations plays an important role in drug development. Recently, the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) has been implemented for the purpose of waiving bioequivalence studies on the basis of the solubility and gastrointestinal permeability of drug substance. Using the rationale of the BCS, it can be argued that biowaivers can, however, also be granted on the basis of standard pharmacokinetic data. If a drug exhibits dose-linear pharmacokinetics and a sufficiently fast dissolution profile, it can be concluded that this drug appears to pose no problem with respect to absorption. It should be noted that a change of an immediate-release tablet formulation can only lead to a deviating rate and/or extent of absorption when release of the drug from the formulation is altered. Logically, the dissolution profiles of the different formulations should be equal to guarantee bioequivalency. Thus, both BCS and the alternative linear pharmacokinetics approach require an evaluation of dissolution profiles. The justification of BCS is found in the permeability classification of the compound, while those of the linear pharmacokinetics lie in the apparent lack of a permeability problem. For example, in this context P-glycoprotein-transported drugs form an interesting class of compounds, which may be treated likewise when complying to the aforementioned requirements. Furthermore, poorly soluble compounds may be less troublesome than expected. It is shown that linear kinetics can be explained by the solubilising activity of, for example, bile salts. In this instance, linear pharmacokinetics shows that elevated doses do not appear to exhibit a limiting role on the dissolution. Hence, a change in formulation without any effect on the dissolution profile is not expected to cause a change in availability. It is clear that the formulations to be compared should not contain excipients that display an effect on (presystemic) drug metabolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15568890     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  24 in total

Review 1.  In vitro-in vivo correlations for lipophilic, poorly water-soluble drugs.

Authors:  J B Dressman; C Reppas
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 2.  Bioavailability and bioequivalence: an FDA regulatory overview.

Authors:  M L Chen; V Shah; R Patnaik; W Adams; A Hussain; D Conner; M Mehta; H Malinowski; J Lazor; S M Huang; D Hare; L Lesko; D Sporn; R Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a novel, selective antiprogestagen (Org 31710) in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  T M Mulders; C P Mink; I W Bobbink; H J Bennink
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Pharmacokinetics of naproxen overdoses.

Authors:  R Runkel; M D Chaplin; H Sevelius; E Ortega; E Segre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  On the pharmacokinetics of domperidone in animals and man. IV. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous domperidone and its bioavailability in man following intramuscular, oral and rectal administration.

Authors:  J Heykants; R Hendriks; W Meuldermans; M Michiels; H Scheygrond; H Reyntjens
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen and its enantiomers.

Authors:  F Jamali; D R Brocks
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen.

Authors:  N M Davies; K E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Solubilization and wetting effects of bile salts on the dissolution of steroids.

Authors:  V Bakatselou; R C Oppenheim; J B Dressman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen enantiomers after different doses of the racemate.

Authors:  G Geisslinger; S Menzel; K Wissel; K Brune
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  4 in total

1.  Elucidating the role of dose in the biopharmaceutics classification of drugs: the concepts of critical dose, effective in vivo solubility, and dose-dependent BCS.

Authors:  Georgia Charkoftaki; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Georgia Valsami; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  In silico prediction of drug dissolution and absorption with variation in intestinal pH for BCS class II weak acid drugs: ibuprofen and ketoprofen.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsume; Peter Langguth; Alfredo Garcia-Arieta; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.627

3.  The Biopharmaceutics Classification System: subclasses for in vivo predictive dissolution (IPD) methodology and IVIVC.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsume; Deanna M Mudie; Peter Langguth; Greg E Amidon; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Maximum tolerated dose evaluation of the AMPA modulator Org 26576 in healthy volunteers and depressed patients: a summary and method analysis of bridging research in support of phase II dose selection.

Authors:  Kari R Nations; Roberta Bursi; Peter Dogterom; Larry Ereshefsky; Lev Gertsik; Tim Mant; Jacques Schipper
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2012-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.