Literature DB >> 11779644

Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty.

Mark E Nadzadi1, Douglas R Pedersen, John J Callaghan, Thomas D Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine the role of surgical orientation of the acetabular cup on posterior dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty.
DESIGN: A finite element model of a widely used total hip arthroplasty system was examined for peak resisting moment and range-of-motion prior to impingement, as well as prior to onset of posterior dislocation. Acetabular component surgical orientation was varied.
BACKGROUND: Dislocation is a leading cause of total hip replacement failure, with an incidence between 2% and 11%. Clinical registries imply acetabular component orientation to be a leading predictor of dislocation. The finite element method permits this complex kinetic behavior to be addressed systematically.
METHODS: Twenty-five combinations of cup abduction (five angles) and anteversion (five angles) were studied, with the resultant resisting moment about the cup center being tracked in each case. Key events were benchmarked, and a novel dislocation resistance index was developed for multi-factor comparison.
RESULTS: Increasing tilt and/or anteversion resulted in a monotonically increasing range-of-motion prior to impingement, as well as increased peak resisting moment. Range of motion was more sensitive to tilt, while peak resisting moment was more sensitive to anteversion. Peak resisting moment for 22-mm head size was nearly 25% less than that for a 26-mm head.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased cup tilt and anteversion discourage posterior dislocations of small-head-size components. RELEVANCE: Pre-existing soft tissue compromise and untoward patient motions/postures are largely beyond surgeon control. However, other factors being equal, especially for small-head-size components, many posterior dislocations that would otherwise occur might be prevented by suitable tilt and anteversion of the acetabular component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11779644     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  13 in total

1.  Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Megan K O'Brien; Nicholas J Stroud; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effects of implant design parameters on fluid convection, potentiating third-body debris ingress into the bearing surface during THA impingement/subluxation.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas E Baer; Marian Muste; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The capsule's contribution to total hip construct stability--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Nicholas J Stroud; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Douglas R Pedersen; Benjamin J Ellis; John J Callaghan; Jeffrey A Weiss; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; Jacob M Elkins; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

5.  Using nonlinear finite element models to analyse stress distribution during subluxation and torque required for dislocation of newly developed total hip structure after prosthetic impingement.

Authors:  Wei-Min Chi; Chien-Chung Lin; Ying-Jui Ho; Hsiao-Che Lin; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Bone-on-bone versus hardware impingement in total hips: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2012

7.  Biomechanical model based evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasty therapy outcome.

Authors:  Jörg Eschweiler; Julia Hawlitzky; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Björn Rath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-09-21

8.  Assessment of the applicability of the Hertzian contact theory to edge-loaded prosthetic hip bearings.

Authors:  Anthony P Sanders; Rebecca M Brannon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Personalized image-based templates for precise acetabular prosthesis placement in total hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Sheng-xiang Xiao; Peng-cheng Gu; Xiang-jin Lin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 10.  Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Igor Immerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.