Literature DB >> 25328453

Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences.

Thomas D Brown1, Jacob M Elkins1, Douglas R Pedersen1, John J Callaghan2.   

Abstract

In contemporary total hip arthroplasty, instability has been a complication in approximately 2% to 5% of primary surgeries and 5% to 10% of revisions. Due to the reduction in the incidence of wear-induced osteolysis that has been achieved over the last decade, instability now stands as the single most common reason for revision surgery. Moreover, even without frank dislocation, impingement and subluxation are implicated in a set of new concerns arising with advanced bearings, associated with the relatively unforgiving nature of many of those designs. Against that backdrop, the biomechanical factors responsible for impingement, subluxation, and dislocation remain under-investigated relative to their burden of morbidity. This manuscript outlines a 15-year program of laboratory and clinical research undertaken to improve the scientific basis for understanding total hip impingement and dislocation. The broad theme has been to systematically evaluate the role of surgical factors, implant design factors, and patient factors in predisposing total hip constructs to impinge, sublux, and/or dislocate. Because this class of adverse biomechanical events had not lent itself well to study with existing approaches, it was necessary to develop (and validate) a series of new research methodologies, relying heavily on advanced finite element formulations. Specific areas of focus have included identifying the biomechanical challenges posed by dislocation-prone patient activities, quantifying design parameter effects and component surgical positioning effects for conventional metal-on-polyethylene implant constructs, and the impingement/dislocation behavior of non-conventional constructs, quantifying the stabilizing role of the hip capsule (and of surgical repairs of capsule defects), and systematically studying impingement and edge loading of hard-on-hard bearings, fracture of ceramic liners, confounding effects of patient obesity, and subluxation-mediated worsening of third body particle challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25328453      PMCID: PMC4127709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  58 in total

1.  Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation.

Authors:  C F Scifert; P C Noble; T D Brown; R L Bartz; N Kadakia; N Sugano; R C Johnston; D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  B E Heithoff; J J Callaghan; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; D R Pedersen; R C Johnston
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation.

Authors:  Mark E Nadzadi; Douglas R Pedersen; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Orthopaedic crossfire--Larger femoral heads: a triumph of hope over reason! In the affirmative.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown; Douglas R Pedersen; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Piriformis tendon repair failure after total hip replacement.

Authors:  J T Kao; S T Woolson
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1992-02

6.  Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Megan K O'Brien; Nicholas J Stroud; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance.

Authors:  D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan; T D Brown
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.

Authors:  Suzanne M Bouchard; Kristofer J Stewart; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2,106 patients followed for up to 8 years.

Authors:  Omid Sadr Azodi; Johanna Adami; David Lindström; Karl O Eriksson; Andreas Wladis; Rino Bellocco
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Closed reduction of a dislocated constrained total hip arthroplasty using a novel technique with a PEG board.

Authors:  John H Flint; Phinit Phisitkul; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  9 in total

1.  What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?

Authors:  Timothy S Brown; Richard J McLaughlin; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A Modeling Study of a Patient-specific Safe Zone for THA: Calculation, Validation, and Key Factors Based on Standing and Sitting Sagittal Pelvic Tilt.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Ya Li; Yixin Zhou; Siyuang Wang; Yongqiang Zhao; Zhuyi Ma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Novel Constrained Dual Mobility Hip Prosthesis to Combat Instability in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty whilst Preserving Normal Function.

Authors:  Michael Jiang; Anton Lambers; Rodney Richardson
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-07-07

5.  Postoperative excessive external femoral rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with muscle weakness in iliopsoas and gluteus medius and risk for hip dislocation.

Authors:  Hyonmin Choe; Naomi Kobayashi; Daigo Kobayashi; Shintaro Watanabe; Koki Abe; Taro Tezuka; Yusuke Kawabata; Masanobu Takeyama; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Impingement in total hip arthroplasty: A geometric model.

Authors:  Gregory M Pryce; Bismaya Sabu; Mazen Al-Hajjar; Ruth K Wilcox; Jonathan Thompson; Graham H Isaac; Tim Board; Sophie Williams
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  The Effect of Postural Pelvic Dynamics on the Three-dimensional Orientation of the Acetabular Cup in THA Is Patient Specific.

Authors:  Thom E Snijders; Tom P C Schlösser; Marijn van Straalen; René M Castelein; Rob P Stevenson; Harrie Weinans; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Hip stress distribution - Predictor of dislocation in hip arthroplasties. A retrospective study of 149 arthroplasties.

Authors:  Matevž Tomaževič; Tina Kaiba; Urban Kurent; Rihard Trebše; Matej Cimerman; Veronika Kralj-Iglič
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision.

Authors:  Oskari Pakarinen; Olli Lainiala; Aleksi Reito; Perttu Neuvonen; Keijo Mäkelä; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.