Literature DB >> 11778679

Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.

S W Raudenbush1, L Xiao-Feng.   

Abstract

Consider a study in which 2 groups are followed over time to assess group differences in the average rate of change, rate of acceleration, or higher degree polynomial effect. In designing such a study, one must decide on the duration of the study, frequency of observation, and number of participants. The authors consider how these choices affect statistical power and show that power depends on a standardized effect size, the sample size, and a person-specific reliability coefficient. This reliability, in turn, depends on study duration and frequency. These relations enable researchers to weigh alternative designs with respect to feasibility and power. The authors illustrate the approach using data from published studies of antisocial thinking during adolescence and vocabulary growth during infancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11778679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  122 in total

1.  Perseverate or decenter? Differential effects of metacognition on the relationship between parasympathetic inflexibility and symptoms of depression in a multi-wave study.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Jessica L Hamilton; David M Fresco; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-17

2.  Teaching community program clinicians motivational interviewing using expert and train-the-trainer strategies.

Authors:  Steve Martino; Samuel A Ball; Charla Nich; Monica Canning-Ball; Bruce J Rounsaville; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 3.  Mobile assessment guide for research in schizophrenia and severe mental disorders.

Authors:  David Kimhy; Inez Myin-Germeys; Jasper Palmier-Claus; Joel Swendsen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools.

Authors:  Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Mark LoMurray; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Mariya Petrova; Qin Yu; Erin Walsh; Xin Tu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Linda M Collins
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

6.  Impact of small group size on neighbourhood influences in multilevel models.

Authors:  Katherine P Theall; Richard Scribner; Stephanie Broyles; Qingzhao Yu; Jigar Chotalia; Neal Simonsen; Matthias Schonlau; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Teacher-student relationship quality type in elementary grades: Effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement.

Authors:  Jiun-Yu Wu; Jan N Hughes; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2010-07-23

8.  Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Amanda M Vader; T Robert Harris; Craig A Field; Ernest N Jouriles
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

9.  Psychological distress in patients and caregivers over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Vishal Gupta; Andrew Sikora; Marshall Posner
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multilevel Intervention to Address Social Determinants of Refugee Mental Health.

Authors:  Jessica R Goodkind; Deborah Bybee; Julia Meredith Hess; Suha Amer; Martin Ndayisenga; R Neil Greene; Ryeora Choe; Brian Isakson; Brandon Baca; Mahbooba Pannah
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2020-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.