Hoda Badr1, Vishal Gupta2, Andrew Sikora3, Marshall Posner4. 1. Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: hoda.badr@mssm.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States. 3. Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancer patients and their caregivers report high rates of psychological distress. High rates of physical symptom burden and the increased need for family members to provide caregiving during treatment may contribute to this distress. METHODS: This study examined trajectories of patient and caregiver distress over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer as well as how patients and caregivers influence each other's distress. Forty-nine head and neck cancer patient-caregiver dyads completed 6 weekly assessments of physical symptoms (MDASI-HN) and distress (e.g., NCCN distress thermometer) over the course of radiotherapy. RESULTS: Patient and caregiver distress increased steadily over the course of treatment, peaking at week 5; patients (82% male; 69% Stage 4) and caregivers (90% female) reported significant distress in 77% of cases. Linear mixed models with the patient-caregiver dyad as the unit of analysis showed that increases in patient-rated head and neck specific physical symptoms had a significant (p<.05) time-varying effect on both patient and caregiver distress. Increases in one dyad member's distress levels were also significantly associated with decreases in the other's distress levels over time. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the adverse impact of patient physical symptoms during radiotherapy on both patient and caregiver distress. They also support a dyadic coping model whereby patients and caregivers manage their distress together as a unit. Overall, dyadic supportive care interventions that focus on controlling patient physical symptoms and that address both patient and caregiver distress are sorely needed in head and neck cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancerpatients and their caregivers report high rates of psychological distress. High rates of physical symptom burden and the increased need for family members to provide caregiving during treatment may contribute to this distress. METHODS: This study examined trajectories of patient and caregiver distress over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer as well as how patients and caregivers influence each other's distress. Forty-nine head and neck cancerpatient-caregiver dyads completed 6 weekly assessments of physical symptoms (MDASI-HN) and distress (e.g., NCCN distress thermometer) over the course of radiotherapy. RESULTS:Patient and caregiver distress increased steadily over the course of treatment, peaking at week 5; patients (82% male; 69% Stage 4) and caregivers (90% female) reported significant distress in 77% of cases. Linear mixed models with the patient-caregiver dyad as the unit of analysis showed that increases in patient-rated head and neck specific physical symptoms had a significant (p<.05) time-varying effect on both patient and caregiver distress. Increases in one dyad member's distress levels were also significantly associated with decreases in the other's distress levels over time. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the adverse impact of patient physical symptoms during radiotherapy on both patient and caregiver distress. They also support a dyadic coping model whereby patients and caregivers manage their distress together as a unit. Overall, dyadic supportive care interventions that focus on controlling patient physical symptoms and that address both patient and caregiver distress are sorely needed in head and neck cancer.
Authors: Cindy L Carmack Taylor; Hoda Badr; Ji H Lee; Frank Fossella; Katherine Pisters; Ellen R Gritz; Leslie Schover Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2008-09-17
Authors: Allen M Chen; Richard L S Jennelle; Victoria Grady; Adrienne Tovar; Kris Bowen; Patty Simonin; Janice Tracy; Dale McCrudden; Jonathan R Stella; Srinivasan Vijayakumar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Laurelie R Wall; Sanjeewa Kularatna; Elizabeth C Ward; Bena Cartmill; Anne J Hill; Elizabeth Isenring; Joshua Byrnes; Sandro V Porceddu Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: M-S Paek; C L Nightingale; J A Tooze; B-J Milliron; K E Weaver; K R Sterba Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Heidi Mason; Mary Beth DeRubeis; Nancy Burke; Melissa Shannon; Danielle Karsies; Gregory Wolf; Avi Eisbruch; Francis Worden Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-10
Authors: Ronald Maggiore; Zachary S Zumsteg; Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Kelly M Trevino; Ajeet Gajra; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Joel B Epstein; Stewart M Bond; Ira Parker; Julie A Kish; Barbara A Murphy; Noam A VanderWalde Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chandylen L Nightingale; Deidre B Pereira; Barbara A Curbow; John R Wingard; Giselle D Carnaby Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.522