Literature DB >> 11756719

Recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and related procedures: 1996-1998 practice patterns.

David C Levin1, Laurence Parker, Charles M Intenzo, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate cardiac nuclear medicine practice patterns in different physician specialty groups to better understand a recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and certain supplementary examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Medicare Part B databases from 1996 and 1998 were used to evaluate utilization of four primary procedure codes for radionuclide MPI and two supplementary codes (add-on left ventricular wall motion or left ventricular ejection fraction). Utilization rates were calculated for cardiologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Other cardiac imaging for which radionuclide imaging might be substituted was similarly studied.
RESULTS: Overall utilization rate of radionuclide MPI per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased 19.1%, from 4,046 in 1996 to 4,820 in 1998 (P <.001). However, for cardiologists the rate increased from 1,771 to 2,413 (36.3%), whereas for radiologists it increased from 1,958 to 2,031 (3.7%) (P <.001 for both changes). Overall utilization rate of add-on codes increased 264% from 1,006 to 3,657 (P <.001). By 1998, the ratio of these add-on examinations to primary MPI was 0.94 among cardiologists compared with 0.53 among radiologists (relative risk, 1.77; 95% CI: 1.76, 1.78). Cardiologist-performed stress echocardiography and cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography increased by 24.2% and 8.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Growth in utilization of radionuclide MPI between 1996 and 1998 was almost 10 times higher among cardiologists than radiologists. Utilization of the two add-on codes increased even more dramatically. The greater use of MPI is not a substitute for other cardiac imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756719     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2221010443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Activity and practice of nuclear cardiology in the Czech Republic, 2001.

Authors:  Milan Kamínek; Václav Husák; Miroslav Myslivecek; Otto Lang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Authors:  Sharon W Kwan; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Robert K Kerlan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computed tomographic imaging within nuclear cardiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Cost-effectiveness of new tests to diagnose and treat coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Allen J Taylor; Patrick G O'Malley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-08

Review 6.  Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in asymptomatic diabetic patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Ajay Yerramasu; Shreenidhi Venuraju Maggae; Avijit Lahiri; Dhakshinamurthy Vijay Anand
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Patterns and predictors of stress testing modality after percutaneous coronary stenting: data from the NCDR(®).

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Daniel W Mudrick; Bimal R Shah; Sally C Stearns; Frederick A Masoudi; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia L Green; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

8.  Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predicts a very low risk of inducible ischemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have a role?

Authors:  Jamieson M Bourque; Benjamin H Holland; Denny D Watson; George A Beller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Ethical considerations in CT angiography.

Authors:  Samuel Wann; Andy L Nassef; Justin Jeffrey; Joseph V Messer; Norbert M Wilke; Andre J Duerinckx; James C Blankenship; Michael K Rosenberg; Donald H Dembo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Impact of the Publication of Appropriate Use Criteria on Utilization Rates of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Studies in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Idan Roifman; Peter C Austin; Feng Qiu; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.