Literature DB >> 23058063

Patterns and predictors of stress testing modality after percutaneous coronary stenting: data from the NCDR(®).

Jerome J Federspiel1, Daniel W Mudrick, Bimal R Shah, Sally C Stearns, Frederick A Masoudi, Patricia A Cowper, Cynthia L Green, Pamela S Douglas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated temporal trends and geographic variation in choice of stress testing modality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as associations between modality and procedure use after testing.
BACKGROUND: Stress testing is frequently performed post-PCI, but the choices among available modalities (electrocardiography only, nuclear, or echocardiography; pharmacological or exercise stress) and consequences of such choices are not well characterized.
METHODS: CathPCI Registry(®) data were linked with identifiable Medicare claims to capture stress testing use between 60 and 365 days post-PCI and procedures within 90 days after testing. Testing rates and modality used were modeled on the basis of patient, procedure, and PCI facility factors, calendar quarter, and Census Divisions using Poisson and logistic regression. Post-test procedure use was assessed using Gray's test.
RESULTS: Among 284,971 patients, the overall stress testing rate after PCI was 53.1 per 100 person-years. Testing rates declined from 59.3 in quarter 1 (2006) to 47.1 in quarter 4 (2008), but the relative use of modalities changed little. Among exercise testing recipients, adjusted proportions receiving electrocardiography-only testing varied from 6.8% to 22.8% across Census Divisions; and among exercise testing recipients having an imaging test, the proportion receiving echocardiography (versus nuclear) varied from 9.4% to 34.1%. Post-test procedure use varied among modalities; exercise electrocardiography-only testing was associated with more subsequent stress testing (13.7% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001), but less catheterization (7.4% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001) than imaging-based tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Modest reductions in stress testing after PCI occurring between 2006 and 2008 cannot be ascribed to trends in use of any single modality. Additional research should assess whether this trend represents better patient selection for testing or administrative policies (e.g., restricted access for patients with legitimate testing needs). Geographic variation in utilization of stress modalities and differences in downstream procedure use among modalities suggest a need to identify optimal use of the different test modalities in individual patients.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23058063      PMCID: PMC3628616          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  17 in total

1.  Recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and related procedures: 1996-1998 practice patterns.

Authors:  David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Charles M Intenzo; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Why all the focus on cardiac imaging?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Thomas H Marwick; William A Zoghbi; W Gregory Hundley; Christopher M Kramer; Stephan Achenbach; Vasken Dilsizian; Morton J Kern; Y Chandrashekhar; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

4.  Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice.

Authors:  Bimal R Shah; Patricia A Cowper; Sean M O'Brien; Neil Jensen; Matthew Drawz; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Michael A DeLorenzo; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Choice of imaging modality in the assessment of coronary artery disease risk in extreme obesity.

Authors:  Julia P Dunn; Mary M Huizinga; Raphael See; Waleed N Irani
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  President's Page: An arrow to the heart.

Authors:  Alfred A Bove
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in morbidly obese patients: image quality, hemodynamic response to pharmacologic stress, and diagnostic and prognostic value.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Lori B Croft; Jared S Corriel; Andrew J Einstein; Jonathan E Fisher; Pilar S Haynes; Randi K Rose; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers.

Authors:  Bradley G Hammill; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin A Schulman; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patient Symptoms and Stress Testing After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Monica Parks; Wenhui Liu; Stephen W Waldo; P Michael Ho; Steven M Bradley; Paul L Hess
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Variation in use of echocardiography among veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration vs Medicare.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Fenton H McCarthy; Sheeva Rajaei; Andrew J Epstein; Paul A Heidenreich; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Impact of choice of imaging modality accompanying outpatient exercise stress testing on outcomes and resource use after revascularization for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Bimal R Shah; Leslee J Shaw; Frederick A Masoudi; Patricia P Chang; Sally C Stearns; Daniel W Mudrick; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia L Green; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging after coronary revascularization: a clinical appraisal.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Maria Piera Petretta; Stefania Daniele; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Stress Testing Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Elias J Dayoub; Paul L Hess; Lucas N Marzec; Frederick A Masoudi; P Michael Ho; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Variation in Management of Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool (VA CART) Program.

Authors:  Amneet Sandhu; Maggie A Stanislawski; Gary K Grunwald; Kathryn Guinn; Javier Valle; Daniel Matlock; P Michael Ho; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Phase analysis single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) detects dyssynchrony in myocardial scar and increases specificity of MPI.

Authors:  John P Bois; Chris Scott; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Raymond J Gibbons; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.138

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.