Literature DB >> 11754456

Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts.

Lambertus W Bartels1, Chris J G Bakker, Max A Viergever.   

Abstract

In this study, a method is proposed for MRI of the lumen of metallic vascular implants, like stents or vena cava filters. The method is based on the reduction of artifacts caused by flow, susceptibility, and RF eddy currents. Whereas both flow artifacts and susceptibility artifacts are well understood and documented, RF artifacts are not. Therefore, the present study comprises an in-depth theoretical explanation of the factors governing the severity of these RF artifacts. It is explained that the RF caging inside cage-like implants is caused by disturbances of the send and receive sensitivities due to coupling between the loops in the implant and the MR scanner's send and receive coils. A scaled excitation angle model describing the behavior of the signal intensity inside the implants as a function of the applied nominal excitation angle is introduced. This theoretical model was validated in phantom experiments. Reduced signal from within implants due to the caging problem could be restored by increasing the applied RF power in the excitation pulse, without exceeding the generally accepted SAR safety limits. The method was tested in vitro and in vivo in a pig model and allowed adequate depiction of the interior of a nitinol stent and that of a vena cava filter in contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. Magn Reson Med 47:171-180, 2002. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11754456     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  19 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  M Lettau; A Sauer; S Heiland; S Rohde; M Bendszus; S Hähnel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device.

Authors:  C Timsit; S Soize; A Benaissa; C Portefaix; J-Y Gauvrit; L Pierot
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.

Authors:  Y J Heo; H W Jeong; J W Baek; S T Kim; Y G Jeong; J Y Lee; S-C Jin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.

Authors:  Gitsios Gitsioudis; Philipp Fortner; Matthias Stuber; Anna Missiou; Florian Andre; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: in vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices.

Authors:  Philipp Kahlert; Holger Eggebrecht; Björn Plicht; Oliver Kraff; Ian McDougall; Brad Decker; Raimund Erbel; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  An overview on the advances in cardiovascular interventional MR imaging.

Authors:  Olaf Saborowski; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Physiological recordings: basic concepts and implementation during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Marcus A Gray; Ludovico Minati; Neil A Harrison; Peter J Gianaros; Vitaly Napadow; Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.