Literature DB >> 11752936

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: dose the test dose bolus represent the main dose bolus accurately?

J J Lee1, Y Chang, D S Kang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the time-intensity curves acquired by test and main dose contrast injections for MR angiography are similar.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 11 patients, repeated contrast-enhanced 2D-turbo-FLASH scans with 1-sec interval were obtained. Both test and main dose time intensity curves were acquired from the abdominal aorta, and the parameters of time-intensity curves for the test and main boluses were compared. The parameters used were arterial and venous enhancement times, arterial peak enhancement time, arteriovenous circulation time, enhancement duration and enhancement expansion ratio.
RESULTS: Between the main and test boluses, arterial and venous enhancement times and arteriovenous circulation time showed statistically significant correlation (p < 0.01), with correlation coefficients of 0.95, 0.92 and 0.98 respectively. Although the enhancement duration was definitely greater than infusion time, reasonable measurement of the end enhancement point in the main bolus was impossible.
CONCLUSION: Only arterial and venous enhancement times and arteriovenous circulation time of the main bolus could be predicted from the test-bolus results. The use of these reliable parameters would lead to improvements in the scan timing method for MR angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11752936      PMCID: PMC2718170          DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2000.1.2.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


  13 in total

1.  Effect of the rate of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration on abdominal vascular and soft-tissue MR imaging enhancement patterns.

Authors:  P J Strouse; M R Prince; T L Chenevert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  D A Leung; G C McKinnon; C P Davis; T Pfammatter; G P Krestin; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography.

Authors:  K Y Ho; T Leiner; M W de Haan; A G Kessels; P J Kitslaar; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold.

Authors:  J J Snidow; M S Johnson; V J Harris; P M Margosian; A M Aisen; S G Lalka; D F Cikrit; S O Trerotola
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector.

Authors:  J P Earls; N M Rofsky; D R DeCorato; G A Krinsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

Authors:  M R Prince; D L Narasimham; J C Stanley; T L Chenevert; D M Williams; M V Marx; K J Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  L Kopka; R Vosshenrich; J Rodenwaldt; E Grabbe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Gadolinium-enhanced magnitude contrast MR angiography of popliteal and tibial arteries.

Authors:  S V Lossef; S S Rajan; R H Patt; M Carvlin; D Calcagno; M N Gomes; K H Barth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Intraarterial portography with gadopentetate dimeglumine: improved liver-to-lesion contrast in MR imaging.

Authors:  P Pavone; S Giuliani; G Cardone; R Occhiato; P Di Renzi; G A Petroni; C Buoni; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis.

Authors:  K C Kent; R R Edelman; D Kim; T I Steinman; D H Porter; J J Skillman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bilateral ce-MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T and 1.5 T: intraindividual comparison of quantitative and qualitative image parameters in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jan Thorsten Winterer; Olaf Moske-Eick; Michael Markl; Alexander Frydrychowicz; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MR imaging of congenital heart diseases in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Y H Choe; I S Kang; S W Park; H J Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.