Literature DB >> 11743287

Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.

Weber K Lau1, Erik J Bergstralh, Michael L Blute, Jeffrey M Slezak, Horst Zincke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term outcome of radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason score 8 or greater prostate cancer and characterized the prognostic significance of other pathological variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,419 patients underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1996. There were 407 patients classified as having pathological Gleason 8 or greater, including 8 in 48%, 9 in 49% and 10 in 3%. Adjuvant treatment was used in 45% of patients and adjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 155 (38%). Progression-free, including local or systemic, and/or prostate specific antigen (PSA) 0.4 ng./ml. or greater, and cancer specific survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of pathological grade and stage, preoperative PSA, DNA ploidy, margin status, tumor dimension, seminal vesicle invasion, and adjuvant treatment was assessed with the univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Pathological stage distribution was pT2 in 26% of patients, pT3 48% and pTxN+ 27%. Overall and progression-free survival at 10 years was 67% and 36%, respectively, compared to cancer specific survival 85%. Adjuvant treatment, pathological stage, preoperative PSA and pathological grade were significant (less than 0.05) univariate predictors of progression-free survival. Pathological stage, margin status and ploidy were univariately associated with cancer specific survival. Progression-free survival at 10 years of those patients who did and did not receive adjuvant treatment was 52% and 23%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis pathological grade (p=0.02), preoperative PSA (p <0.0001), adjuvant therapy (p <0.0001) and pathological stage (p=0.036) were significant independent predictors of progression-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: High grade prostate cancer can be controlled with radical prostatectomy in some patients with disease confined pathologically, and 10-year cause specific survival is 96%. Predictors of outcome in patients with Gleason 8 disease or greater are similar to established predictors derived by using all grades. Although adjuvant hormonal therapy appears to improve disease progression rates after radical prostatectomy on the basis of this nonrandomized study, it may not affect prostate cancer death rates within 10 years in patients with high grade cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11743287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

1.  eIF4E phosphorylation promotes tumorigenesis and is associated with prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Luc Furic; Liwei Rong; Ola Larsson; Ismaël Hervé Koumakpayi; Kaori Yoshida; Andrea Brueschke; Emmanuel Petroulakis; Nathaniel Robichaud; Michael Pollak; Louis A Gaboury; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Fred Saad; Nahum Sonenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  [Diagnostics and therapy of localized prostate cancer: a problem-oriented account].

Authors:  C Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Authors:  Ji Eun Heo; Jee Soo Park; Jong Soo Lee; Jongchan Kim; Won Sik Jang; Nam Hoon Cho; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading.

Authors:  John F Donohue; Fernando J Bianco; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Andrew J Vickers; Thomas M Wheeler; Peter T Scardino; Victor A Reuter; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Thomas J Guzzo; Misop Han; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jonathan I Epstein; Edward M Schaeffer; Mark Schoenberg; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Contemporary management of high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Garzotto; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Role of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; James A Eastham
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.