Literature DB >> 12712362

Object recognition by echolocation: a nectar-feeding bat exploiting the flowers of a rain forest vine.

D von Helversen1, O von Helversen.   

Abstract

In the bat-pollinated vine Mucuna holtonii only the first visit to a flower is rewarded with a substantial amount of nectar, which is released when a bat lands on the flower and triggers an explosion mechanism. During later visits the bats receive only small amounts of nectar. Nevertheless, the inflorescences as a whole remain attractive, since further buds successively open during the night. Nectar-feeding bats Glossophaga commissarisi selectively visit unexploded, "virgin" flowers. They can discriminate buds, virgin and exploded flowers using echolocation. In field experiments bats exploited virgin flowers, the vexillum of which had been replaced by a same-sized triple mirror or by an artificial vexillum. Such flowers were frequently inspected, but not as often exploited as natural flowers. In two-alternative-forced-choice experiments the bats learned to discriminate between replicas of the vexillum and triple mirrors. The recognition distance was between 15 and 50 cm. Echoes of the three flowering stages differ in their spectral composition, which changes in dependence of the sound incidence angle in a characteristic way. We conclude that glossophagine bats are able to recognize small motionless structures like flowers and to accurately adjust their landing manoeuvres by using their echolocation system alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12712362     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0405-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats.

Authors:  R Arlettaz; G Jones; P A Racey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Foliage echoes: a probe into the ecological acoustics of bat echolocation.

Authors:  R Müller; R Kuc
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Range resolution and the possible use of spectral information in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J Mogdans; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sulphur-containing "perfumes" attract flower-visiting bats.

Authors:  O von Helversen; L Winkler; H J Bestmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats.

Authors:  G Neuweiler
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Target structure and echo spectral discrimination by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; W A Lavender; B A Lavender; C A Doroshow; S W Kiefer; R Livingston; A C Scallet; D E Crowley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Target discrimination by the echolocating bat Vampyrum spectrum.

Authors:  J W Bradbury
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1970-01

8.  Visual form discrimination by echolocating bats.

Authors:  R Suthers; J Chase; B Braford
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 1.818

9.  Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  C F Moss; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; C F Moss; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  19 in total

1.  Object classification by echolocation in nectar feeding bats: size-independent generalization of shape.

Authors:  D von Helversen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Complex echo classification by echo-locating bats: a review.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias O Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; J Blair Perot; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Bioinspired sonar reflectors as guiding beacons for autonomous navigation.

Authors:  Ralph Simon; Stefan Rupitsch; Markus Baumann; Huan Wu; Herbert Peremans; Jan Steckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nectar production dynamics and sugar composition in two Mucuna species (Leguminosae, Faboideae) with different specialized pollinators.

Authors:  Kayna Agostini; Marlies Sazima; Leonardo Galetto
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-09-18

6.  Field metabolic rates of phytophagous bats: do pollination strategies of plants make life of nectar-feeders spin faster?

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Detlev H Kelm; G Henk Visser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Adaptive behavior for texture discrimination by the free-flying big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Ben Falk; Tameeka Williams; Murat Aytekin; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Classification of natural textures in echolocation.

Authors:  Jan-Eric Grunwald; Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modelling sensory limitation: the role of tree selection, memory and information transfer in bats' roost searching strategies.

Authors:  Ireneusz Ruczyński; Kamil A Bartoń
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bat guilds, a concept to classify the highly diverse foraging and echolocation behaviors of microchiropteran bats.

Authors:  Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.