Literature DB >> 11741493

The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation.

J L Redpath1, D Liang, T H Taylor, C Christie, E Elmore.   

Abstract

A dose-response curve for gamma-radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of HeLa x skin fibroblast human hybrid cells over the dose range 0.1 cGy to 1 Gy is presented. In the experimental protocol used, the spontaneous (background) frequency of neoplastic transformation of sham-irradiated cultures was compared to that of cultures which had been irradiated with (137)Cs gamma radiation and either plated immediately or held for 24 h at 37 degrees C prior to plating, for assay for neoplastic transformation. The pooled data from a minimum of three repeat large-scale experiments at each dose demonstrated a reduced transformation frequency for the irradiated compared to the sham-irradiated cells for doses of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 cGy for the delayed-plating arm. The probability of this happening by chance is given by 1/2(n), where n is the number of observations (5); i.e., 1/32 congruent with 0.031. This is indicative of an adaptive response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation at least up to a dose of 10 cGy of gamma radiation. The high-dose data obtained at 30 and 50 cGy and 1 Gy showed a good fit to a linear extrapolation through the sham-irradiated, zero-dose control. The delayed-plating data at 10 cGy and below showed a statistically significant divergence from this linear extrapolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11741493     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0700:tsotdr]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  52 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The impact of adaptive and non-targeted effects in the biological responses to low dose/low fluence ionizing radiation: the modulating effect of linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Sonia M de Toledo; Manuela Buonanno; Min Li; Nesrin Asaad; Yong Qin; Geraldine Gonon; Grace Shim; Mariann Galdass; Yaa Boateng; Jie Zhang; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells.

Authors:  W Göggelmann; C Jacobsen; W Panzer; L Walsh; H Roos; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Response to the comment on "re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells" by W. Göggelmann, C. Jacobsen, W. Panzer, L. Walsh, H. Roos, E. Schmid (2003) Radiat Environ Biophys 42:175-182.

Authors:  Ernst Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Stochastic threshold microdose model for cell killing by insoluble metallic nanomaterial particles.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.