Literature DB >> 11733716

Cognitive demands of executing postural reactions: does aging impede attention switching?

B E Maki1, A Zecevic, H Bateni, N Kirshenbaum, W E McIlroy.   

Abstract

A new dual-task paradigm was used to investigate age-related differences in attentional dynamics during rapid balancing reactions evoked by small, unpredictable antero-posterior platform movements. The perturbations were delivered while subjects performed a continuous visuo-motor pursuit-tracking task. Onset of significant deviation in tracking was inferred to indicate switching of attentional resources between tracking and balancing tasks. Although tracking deviation was equally likely to occur subsequent to postural perturbation in healthy young and older adults, deviation onset was delayed, on average, by 67% (123 ms) in the older subjects. Delay in onset of tracking deviation correlated with subsequent delay in generating the peak stabilizing postural response at the ankle. These results suggest that impaired attentional dynamics may exacerbate postural instability in older adults.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733716     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  29 in total

1.  Why does older adults' balance become less stable when walking and performing a secondary task? Examination of attentional switching abilities.

Authors:  Teresa D Hawkes; Ka-Chun Siu; Patima Silsupadol; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Time to disengage: holding an object influences the execution of rapid compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions for recovery from whole-body instability.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; B Lakhani; S Akram; V Miyasike Da Silva; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Postural prioritization defines the interaction between a reaction time task and postural perturbations.

Authors:  Martijn L T M Müller; Mark S Redfern; J Richard Jennings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Modulation of working memory load distinguishes individuals with and without balance impairments following mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Woytowicz; Chandler Sours; Rao P Gullapalli; Joseph Rosenberg; Kelly P Westlake
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Attentional requirements of postural control in people with spinal cord injury: the effect of dual task.

Authors:  C M Tse; M G Carpenter; T Liu-Ambrose; A E Chisholm; T Lam
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Tai Chi practitioners have better postural control and selective attention in stepping down with and without a concurrent auditory response task.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Ka-Chun Siu; Siu N Fu; Christina W Y Hui-Chan; William W N Tsang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Influence of non-spatial working memory demands on reach-grasp responses to loss of balance: Effects of age and fall risk.

Authors:  Kelly P Westlake; Brian P Johnson; Robert A Creath; Rachel M Neff; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.