Literature DB >> 10597416

Cleaning genotype data.

K W Broman1.   

Abstract

The identification of genes contributing to variation in complex phenotypes requires genetic data of high fidelity. Thus, the identification of pedigree and genotyping errors is a crucial prerequisite to the analysis of data from a genome scan for disease genes. The problem has been given little attention in most gene hunting papers; the focus has often been on eliminating mendelian inconsistencies in order that the analysis may proceed, rather than on achieving the best possible data. Though a number of computer programs are available to assist in the identification of genotyping and pedigree errors, the process is still not completely automated. While the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) data set for GAW11 is completely compatible with Mendel's rules, there are still some errors present. We inspected the COGA data for the presence of additional errors, and identified five possible pedigree errors.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10597416     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370170714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  7 in total

1.  Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.

Authors:  Solveig K Sieberts; Ellen M Wijsman; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Statistical genetic issues for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

4.  Quality control procedures for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Stephen Turner; Loren L Armstrong; Yuki Bradford; Christopher S Carlson; Dana C Crawford; Andrew T Crenshaw; Mariza de Andrade; Kimberly F Doheny; Jonathan L Haines; Geoffrey Hayes; Gail Jarvik; Lan Jiang; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Hua Ling; Teri A Manolio; Martha Matsumoto; Catherine A McCarty; Andrew N McDavid; Daniel B Mirel; Justin E Paschall; Elizabeth W Pugh; Luke V Rasmussen; Russell A Wilke; Rebecca L Zuvich; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01

5.  Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; Jochen Musch; Juergen Enczmann; Johannes Fischer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

6.  Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Cathy C Laurie; Kimberly F Doheny; Daniel B Mirel; Elizabeth W Pugh; Laura J Bierut; Tushar Bhangale; Frederick Boehm; Neil E Caporaso; Marilyn C Cornelis; Howard J Edenberg; Stacy B Gabriel; Emily L Harris; Frank B Hu; Kevin B Jacobs; Peter Kraft; Maria Teresa Landi; Thomas Lumley; Teri A Manolio; Caitlin McHugh; Ian Painter; Justin Paschall; John P Rice; Kenneth M Rice; Xiuwen Zheng; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Pedigree and genotype errors in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Gerry Brush; Laura Almasy
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 2.797

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.