Literature DB >> 20462566

Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks.

Laura A Frey Law1, Jennifer E Lee, Tara R McMullen, Ting Xia.   

Abstract

Ratings of perceived discomfort (0 to 10 scale) have been used to estimate relative maximum holding times (%MHT), particularly for static tasks. A linear 1:10% ratio has been described, where a rating of 5 corresponds to 50%MHT. It is unknown whether this linear ratio is valid for dynamic tasks. Additionally, whether pain or exertion are the primary predictors of discomfort is not clear. Thus, the goal of this study was to investigate both pain and exertion ratings during static (50% maximum; N=42) and dynamic (75% maximum; N=34) elbow flexion tasks until failure. Gender, self-reported physical activity, and peak torque were also assessed. Pain and exertion ratings reasonably matched the 1:10% ratio during the static task but not during the dynamic task. Exertion related more strongly to MHT than pain in both tasks. Neither gender nor activity level appeared to influence perceptual ratings, but peak torque explained approximately 20% of the variance in MHT.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20462566      PMCID: PMC2929289          DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  39 in total

1.  Can occupational guidelines for work-rest schedules be based on endurance time data?

Authors:  S E Mathiassen; J Winkel
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  [Determination of the recovery pause for static work of man].

Authors:  W ROHMERT
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1960

3.  Quadriceps activation and perceived exertion during a high intensity, steady state contraction to failure.

Authors:  D M Pincivero; W S Gear
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity.

Authors:  Maria Hagströmer; Pekka Oja; Michael Sjöström
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  G Borg; G Ljunggren; R Ceci
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1985

6.  Perception of effort during constant work to self-imposed exhaustion.

Authors:  D H Horstman; W P Morgan; A Cymerman; J Stokes
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-06

7.  An in vivo microanalytical technique for measuring the local biochemical milieu of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Jay P Shah; Terry M Phillips; Jerome V Danoff; Lynn H Gerber
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-07-21

8.  Control of blood-gas and acid-base status during isometric exercise in humans.

Authors:  D C Poole; S A Ward; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases.

Authors:  Marjorie L Baldwin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Fatigue influences the dynamic stability of the torso.

Authors:  K P Granata; P Gottipati
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Muscle Pain Induced by Elbow-Flexor Eccentric Exercise.

Authors:  Wing Yin Lau; Anthony J Blazevich; Michael J Newton; Sam Shi Xuan Wu; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Sex differences in muscle activity and motor variability in response to a non-fatiguing repetitive screwing task.

Authors:  Tessy Luger; Robert Seibt; Monika A Rieger; Benjamin Steinhilber
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.027

3.  A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females.

Authors:  Georgina Waller; Melissa Dolby; James Steele; James P Fisher
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.