Literature DB >> 11702488

Familial resemblance of bone mineral density between females 18 years and older and their mothers.

D Picard1, A Imbach, M Couturier, R Lepage, M Picard.   

Abstract

Potential determinants of bone mass were investigated in a group of 70 young females (mean age 26.6 years), daughters of women studied in premenopause. Nutritional data, leisure physical activity level, lifestyle habits as well as familial similarities were assessed. The daughters' bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy absorptiometry, was significantly correlated with their body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.22), dietary vitamin D intake (r = 0.19) and their mothers' BMD (r = 0.44). Multiple regression analysis indicated that only the mothers' BMD remained an independent predictor of bone mass. Mother-daughter correlations were also observed for body weight (r = 0.24), height (r = 0.39), BMI (r = 0.29), dietary calcium intake (r = 0.20), and calcium (r = 0.20) or vitamin D (r = 0.25) intakes from dairy products. Hence, these observations support the evidence that mothers' BMD is the strongest predictor of bone mass of young women in their third decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11702488      PMCID: PMC6979851     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  48 in total

1.  Bone mass and body composition in normal women.

Authors:  R Lindsay; F Cosman; B S Herrington; S Himmelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Bone mass, lean mass, and fat mass: same genes or same environments?

Authors:  T V Nguyen; G M Howard; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Familial resemblance of radial bone mass between premenopausal mothers and their college-age daughters.

Authors:  F A Tylavsky; A D Bortz; R L Hancock; J J Anderson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; J L Hopper; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The bone density of female twins discordant for tobacco use.

Authors:  J L Hopper; E Seeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Bone mineral density in mother-daughter pairs: relations to lifetime exercise, lifetime milk consumption, and calcium supplements.

Authors:  C M Ulrich; C C Georgiou; C M Snow-Harter; D E Gillis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 7.  Alcohol and bone.

Authors:  K Laitinen; M Välimäki
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Bone gain in young adult women.

Authors:  R R Recker; K M Davies; S M Hinders; R P Heaney; M R Stegman; D B Kimmel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Osteoporosis and genetic influence: a three-generation study.

Authors:  S A Kahn; J E Pace; M L Cox; D W Gau; S A Cox; H M Hodkinson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Factors affecting bone density in young adults.

Authors:  A M Fehily; R J Coles; W D Evans; P C Elwood
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

2.  Meeting calcium recommendations during middle childhood reflects mother-daughter beverage choices and predicts bone mineral status.

Authors:  Jennifer O Fisher; Diane C Mitchell; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Michelle L Mannino; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.045

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.