Literature DB >> 7824412

Osteoporosis and genetic influence: a three-generation study.

S A Kahn1, J E Pace, M L Cox, D W Gau, S A Cox, H M Hodkinson.   

Abstract

We have studied 27 triads of mother, daughter and grandmother for possible genetic influence on distal and proximal forearm bone density, measured by single photon absorptiometry. We found a significant correlation of bone density at the proximal forearm between the mothers and grandmothers (r = 0.499, P < 0.01). There was also a weak correlation between proximal forearm bone densities of mothers and daughters (r = 0.327, P < 0.1). Significant correlations were found between the three generations for grip strength, pedometry, height and triceps skinfold thickness. There was also significant correlation between mother and grandmother for alcohol intake. There was no correlation for contraceptive pill use, smoking, dietary calcium intake, body weight or body mass index. The study concludes that, although there are similarities in bone mineral content between the three generations, genetic factors cannot be conclusively proven to be the major determinant of bone density. Lifestyle and environmental factors may have a bearing on achieving the peak bone mass and subsequent development of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7824412      PMCID: PMC2397815          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.70.829.798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

1.  Determinants of forearm bone density in premenopausal women: a study in one general practice.

Authors:  M L Cox; S A Khan; D W Gau; S A Cox; H M Hodkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Genetic determinants of bone mineral content at the spine and radius: a twin study.

Authors:  J Dequeker; J Nijs; A Verstraeten; P Geusens; G Gevers
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; J L Hopper; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Familial resemblance of bone mass in adult women.

Authors:  M R Sowers; T L Burns; R B Wallace
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Bone mineral, serum calcium, and dietary intakes of mother/daughter pairs.

Authors:  J Lutz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Genetic factors in determining bone mass.

Authors:  D M Smith; W E Nance; K W Kang; J C Christian; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Bone mass is low in relatives of osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  R A Evans; G M Marel; E K Lancaster; S Kos; M Evans; S Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparative skeletal mass and radial bone mineral content in black and white women.

Authors:  S H Cohn; C Abesamis; S Yasumura; J F Aloia; I Zanzi; K J Ellis
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  International patterns of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B E Nordin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1966 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Familial resemblance of bone mineral density between females 18 years and older and their mothers.

Authors:  D Picard; A Imbach; M Couturier; R Lepage; M Picard
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  The Influence of Non-preventable Risk Factors on the Development of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Radojka Bijelic; Snjezana Milicevic; Jagoda Balaban
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2019-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.