Literature DB >> 8284003

The bone density of female twins discordant for tobacco use.

J L Hopper1, E Seeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking is recognized as a risk factor for vertebral, forearm, and hip fractures. Since bone density is an important determinant of bone strength, we conducted a study to ascertain whether a deficit in bone density is associated with tobacco use and, if so, to identify the responsible mechanisms.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of bone density at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck and shaft in 41 pairs of female twins (21 monozygotic pairs), 27 to 73 years of age (mean, 49), who were discordant for at least 5 pack-years of smoking (mean, 23; maximum, 64). Bone density was measured by dual-photon absorptiometry. The difference in bone density between the members of a pair was expressed as a percentage of the mean value for the pair.
RESULTS: For every 10 pack-years of smoking, the bone density of the twin who smoked more heavily was 2.0 percent lower at the lumbar spine (P = 0.01), 0.9 percent lower at the femoral neck (P = 0.25), and 1.4 percent lower at the femoral shaft (P = 0.04). These results were not confounded by measured lifestyle factors. In the 20 pairs who were discordant by 20 or more pack-years (mean, 35), the (mean +/- SE) within-pair differences in bone density at the three sites were 9.3 +/- 3.1 percent (P = 0.008), 5.8 +/- 2.9 percent (P = 0.06), and 6.5 +/- 3.2 percent (P = 0.05), respectively. Smoking was associated with higher serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (P = 0.02) and luteinizing hormone (P = 0.03) and lower serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone (P = 0.05). Differences in spinal bone density between members of a pair were associated with differences in the serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone (P = 0.01) and calcium (P = 0.05) and urinary pyridinoline excretion (P = 0.06), a marker of bone resorption.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who smoke one pack of cigarettes each day throughout adulthood will, by the time of menopause, have an average deficit of 5 to 10 percent in bone density, which is sufficient to increase the risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8284003     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  63 in total

1.  Familial resemblance of bone mineral density between females 18 years and older and their mothers.

Authors:  D Picard; A Imbach; M Couturier; R Lepage; M Picard
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Do genetic factors contribute to the association between birth weight and blood pressure?

Authors:  K Christensen; H Støvring; M McGue
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Does smoking affect implant survivorship in total hip arthroplasty? A preliminary retrospective case series.

Authors:  Russell D Meldrum; L Daniel Wurtz; Judy R Feinberg; William N Capello
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

4.  Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Betsy E Smith; Leonidas G Nikolakakos; Charles H Richardson; Hugh F Smisson; Joe S Robinson; David C Parish
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Amount of smoking, pulmonary function, and bone mineral density in middle-aged Korean men: KNHANES 2008-2011.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; A Ram Hong; Jung Hee Kim; Kyoung Min Kim; Bo Kyung Koo; Chan Soo Shin; Sang Wan Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Association of depressive symptoms and anxiety with bone mass and density in ever-smoking and never-smoking adolescent girls.

Authors:  Lorah D Dorn; Elizabeth J Susman; Stephanie Pabst; Bin Huang; Heidi Kalkwarf; Susannah Grimes
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2008-12

7.  Bone mass, depressive, and anxiety symptoms in adolescent girls: variation by smoking and alcohol use.

Authors:  Lorah D Dorn; Stephanie Pabst; Lisa M Sontag; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Jennifer B Hillman; Elizabeth J Susman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Predictors of new vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the general population.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Per Kjaer; Lars Korsholm; Tom Bendix; Joan S Sorensen; Claus Manniche; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  The effects of smoke carcinogens on bone.

Authors:  Carol Yan; Narayan G Avadhani; Jameel Iqbal
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.