Literature DB >> 2509013

Familial resemblance of radial bone mass between premenopausal mothers and their college-age daughters.

F A Tylavsky1, A D Bortz, R L Hancock, J J Anderson.   

Abstract

The influences of heredity and environmental factors on radial bone mass were evaluated in 84 premenopausal mothers with their biological daughters (ages 18-22). Mid- and distal radial bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) were assessed using single-photon absorptiometry. As a group, the daughters (mean age 18.6 years) had 5-10% less bone mass at both the distal and midradial sites than their mothers (mean age 44.2 years). Familial resemblance estimates showed significant relationships between mothers and daughters for mid- and distal BMC and BMD after considering the influence of body mass index (BMI). Daughters with a maternal family history of osteoporosis had 6-7% lower but nonsignificant values of mid- (P = 0.086) and distal BMC (P = 0.075) compared to values of women with a negative family history, whereas mothers with a positive family history had 3-4% lower (NS) values of distal and mid-BMC compared to those of mothers with a negative family history after adjustment for BMI. Multiple regression analyses showed BMI to be the most important determinant of the bone values of the mothers, and both BMI and dietary calcium intake were found to be significant for the daughters. The findings of this study suggest that hereditary contributions from the mothers play an overwhelmingly critical role in the accrual of bone mass by their daughters by ages 18-22, but that environmental influences on bone consolidation during the premenopausal decades may be more important in promoting optimal (peak) bone mass and thereby may help to delay the postmenopausal onset of osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2509013     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  15 in total

1.  MEASUREMENT OF BONE MINERAL IN VIVO: AN IMPROVED METHOD.

Authors:  J R CAMERON; J SORENSON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications for in vivo bone mass measurements.

Authors:  R A Schlenker; W W VonSeggen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1976-04-13

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; J L Hopper; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Interaction of calcium nutrition and physical activity on bone mass in young women.

Authors:  B Kanders; D W Dempster; R Lindsay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Source of estrogen production in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J M Grodin; P K Siiteri; P C MacDonald
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Metacarpal morphometry in monozygotic dizygotic elderly twins.

Authors:  M Møller; A Horsman; B Harvald; M Hauge; K Henningsen; B E Nordin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1978-05-26

7.  Value of single photon absorptiometry in osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  G L Bilbrey; J Weix; G D Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Bone density in women: a modified procedure for measurement of distal radial density.

Authors:  B J Awbrey; P C Jacobson; S A Grubb; W H McCartney; L M Vincent; R V Talmage
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Lifetime calcium intake and physical activity habits: independent and combined effects on the radial bone of healthy premenopausal Caucasian women.

Authors:  L Halioua; J J Anderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  An epidemiologic study of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  N Kreiger; J L Kelsey; T R Holford; T O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  17 in total

1.  Familial resemblance of bone mineral density between females 18 years and older and their mothers.

Authors:  D Picard; A Imbach; M Couturier; R Lepage; M Picard
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Estrogen status and heredity are major determinants of premenopausal bone mass.

Authors:  R Armamento-Villareal; D T Villareal; L V Avioli; R Civitelli
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Familiality and partitioning the variability of femoral bone mineral density in women of child-bearing age.

Authors:  M R Sowers; M Boehnke; M L Jannausch; M Crutchfield; G Corton; T L Burns
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Determinants of peak bone mass in young adult women: a review.

Authors:  J J Anderson; F A Tylavsky; L Halioua; J A Metz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The peak bone mass of Hawaiian, Filipino, Japanese, and white women living in Hawaii.

Authors:  J W Davis; R Novotny; P D Ross; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Estrogen status and bone mass in the premenopausal period: is osteoporosis a developmental disease?

Authors:  R Civitelli; D T Villareal; R Armamento-Villareal
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Association of Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphism with BMD and Homocysteine in Premenopausal North Indian Women.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Pandey; Ankur Singh; Sunil Kumar Polipalli; Sangeeta Gupta; Seema Kapoor
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

10.  Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall; I Persson; R Bergström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.