RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) describe associations between measures of tumor perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), blood flow by (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and metabolism by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F)-FDG PET and (2) improve our understanding of tumor enhancement on MRI through independent measures of tumor metabolism and blood flow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the existing PET and MRI databases from the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology. We identified patients with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent (15)O-water/(18)F-FDG PET within 1 month of clinical DCE-MRI between February 2004 and August 2006. The (15)O-water PET blood flow and (18)F-FDG metabolic rate and tissue transport constant (K(1)) in the primary malignancy were calculated. DCE-MRI peak percent enhancement and peak signal enhancement ratio (SER) were measured for each tumor. Correlations and regression analysis of these variables were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with complete PET and DCE-MRI data were included in the analysis cohort. Peak SER correlated significantly with blood flow (r = 0.73, P = .002) and K(1) (r = 0.76, P = .001). However, peak SER did not correlate significantly with FDG metabolic rate (r = 0.44, P = .101). There were no significant correlations between peak percent enhancement and any of the PET parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that tumor perfusion, represented by (15)O-water PET blood flow, is an important factor in the MRI enhancement of locally advanced breast cancer. A lack of correlation of FDG metabolic rate with blood flow and DCE-MRI kinetics suggests that (18)F-FDG PET provides complementary metabolic information independent of vascular factors.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) describe associations between measures of tumor perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), blood flow by (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and metabolism by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F)-FDG PET and (2) improve our understanding of tumor enhancement on MRI through independent measures of tumor metabolism and blood flow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the existing PET and MRI databases from the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology. We identified patients with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent (15)O-water/(18)F-FDG PET within 1 month of clinical DCE-MRI between February 2004 and August 2006. The (15)O-water PET blood flow and (18)F-FDG metabolic rate and tissue transport constant (K(1)) in the primary malignancy were calculated. DCE-MRI peak percent enhancement and peak signal enhancement ratio (SER) were measured for each tumor. Correlations and regression analysis of these variables were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with complete PET and DCE-MRI data were included in the analysis cohort. Peak SER correlated significantly with blood flow (r = 0.73, P = .002) and K(1) (r = 0.76, P = .001). However, peak SER did not correlate significantly with FDG metabolic rate (r = 0.44, P = .101). There were no significant correlations between peak percent enhancement and any of the PET parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that tumor perfusion, represented by (15)O-water PET blood flow, is an important factor in the MRI enhancement of locally advanced breast cancer. A lack of correlation of FDG metabolic rate with blood flow and DCE-MRI kinetics suggests that (18)F-FDG PET provides complementary metabolic information independent of vascular factors.
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C D Pham; T P Roberts; N van Bruggen; O Melnyk; J Mann; N Ferrara; R L Cohen; R C Brasch Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jeffrey Tseng; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Jeanne M Link; Satoshi Minoshima; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Aaron Charlop; Thomas J Lawton; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Robert B Livingston Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Risa K Vanantwerp; Robert K Doot; Xiaoyu Chai; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Jennifer M Specht; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christopher Loiselle; Peter R Eby; Janice N Kim; Kristine E Calhoun; Kimberly H Allison; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Sue Peacock; Barry E Storer; David A Mankoff; Savannah C Partridge; Constance D Lehman Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Lisa K Dunnwald; Robert K Doot; Jennifer M Specht; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Brenda F Kurland; Erin K Schubert; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vignesh A Arasu; Ryan C-Y Chen; David N Newitt; C Belinda Chang; Hilda Tso; Nola M Hylton; Bonnie N Joe Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Jennifer M Specht; Brenda F Kurland; Susan K Montgomery; Lisa K Dunnwald; Robert K Doot; Julie R Gralow; Georgina K Ellis; Hannah M Linden; Robert B Livingston; Kimberly H Allison; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 12.531