Literature DB >> 18792510

Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations?

J Toby Mordkoff1, Rose Halterman, Peggy Chen.   

Abstract

When the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and target is short (i.e., less than 200 msec) and the number of display locations is small (e.g., only two), exogenous spatial cues produce a benefit in simple response time (RT). However, several recent experiments have found significant costs in these tasks when a large number of display locations is employed (e.g., eight), even at the very short SOAs that usually produce a benefit. The present study explored the dependence of exogenous cuing on the number of display locations and found evidence that both the overall validity of the cues and the specific validity of the cue on the previous trial have strong, additive effects. When a large number of display locations is used, both of these factorswork against a benefit of exogenous cuing on simple RT, reversing the typical finding into a cost. These two effects are suggested to occur within motor and perceptual processes, respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18792510     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.

Authors:  P Maruff; M Yucel; J Danckert; G Stuart; J Currie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

4.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  R W Remington; J C Johnston; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

6.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  On the speed of mental processes.

Authors:  F C Donders
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1969

8.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks.

Authors:  C D Frith; D J Done
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-22
View more
  4 in total

1.  Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Contingent capture and inhibition of return: a comparison of mechanisms.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Jordan A Taylor; Loretta Barry Myers; Jacqueline Nguyen-Espino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sequence effects by non-predictive arrow cues.

Authors:  Qian Qian; Keizo Shinomori; Miao Song
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-12

4.  Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Davood G Gozli; Florian Goller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.