Literature DB >> 11700894

The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.

S Sikström1.   

Abstract

The mirror effect refers to a rather general empirical finding showing that, for two classes of stimuli, the class with the higher hit rates also has a lower false alarm rate. In this article, a parsimonious theory is proposed to account for the mirror effect regarding, specifically, high- and low-frequency items and the associated receiver-operating curves. The theory is implemented in a recurrent network in which one layer represents items and the other represents contexts. It is shown that the frequency mirror effect is found in this simple network if the decision is based on counting the number of active nodes in such a way that performance is optimal or near optimal. The optimal performance requires that the number of active nodes is low, only nodes active in the encoded representation are counted, the activation threshold is set between the old and the new distributions, and normalization is based on the variance of the input. Owing to the interference caused by encoding the to-be-recognized item in several preexperimental contexts, the variance of the input to the context layer is greater for high- than for low-frequency items, which yields lower hit rates and higher false alarm rates for high- than for low-frequency items. Although initially the theory was proposed to account for the mirror effect with respect to word frequency, subsequent simulations have shown that the theory also accounts for strength-based mirror effects within a list and between lists. In this case, consistent with experimental data, the variance theory suggests that focusing attention to the more difficult class within a list affects the hit rate, but not the false alarm rate and not the standard deviations of the underlying density, leading to no mirror effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700894     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Notions of Associative Memory and Sparse Coding.

Authors:  Masato Okada
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1996-11

2.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

5.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The mirror effect and attention-likelihood theory: a reflective analysis.

Authors:  B B Murdock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

9.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  4 in total

1.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Perceptual learning in contrast detection: presence and cost of shifts in response criteria.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Christoph Rasche
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Elizabeth Ditton; Kristie Mitchell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials.

Authors:  Sverker Sikström; Johan Hellman; Mats Dahl; Georg Stenberg; Marcus Johansson
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-04-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.