Literature DB >> 29679290

The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials.

Sverker Sikström1, Johan Hellman2, Mats Dahl2, Georg Stenberg3, Marcus Johansson3.   

Abstract

We present the generalized signal detection theory (GSDT), where familiarity is described by a sparse binomial distribution of binary node activity rather than by normal distribution of familiarity. Items are presented in a distributed representation, where each node receives either noise only, or signal and noise. An old response (i.e., a "yes" response) is made if at least one node receives signal plus noise that is larger than the activation threshold, and item variability is determined by the distribution of activated nodes as the threshold is varied. A distinct representation leads to better performance and a lower ratio of new to old item variability, than a more distributed and less distinct representations. Here we apply the GSDT to empirical data on verbal and olfactory memory and suggest that verbal memory relies on a distinct neural item representation, whereas olfactory memory has a fuzzy neural representation leading to poorer memory and inducing a larger ratio of new to old item variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Memory; Model; Olfactory; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC); Recognition; Signal detection theory; Verbal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679290     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-018-0862-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  31 in total

1.  The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  S Sikström
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance.

Authors:  Robert A Frank; Konstantin Rybalsky; Melinda Brearton; Erica Mannea
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07

Review 6.  The neuronal encoding of information in the brain.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls; Alessandro Treves
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Olfactory metacognition.

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency.

Authors:  M D Rabin; W S Cain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology.

Authors:  G Repovs; A Baddeley
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.