Literature DB >> 11700378

Educational outcomes and leadership to meet the needs of modern health care.

J Spencer1, R Jordan.   

Abstract

If professionals are to be equipped better to meet the needs of modern health care systems and the standards of practice required, significant educational change is still required. Educational change requires leadership, and lack of educational leadership may have impeded change in the past. In practical terms standards refer to outcomes, and thus an outcome based approach to clinical education is advocated as the one most likely to provide an appropriate framework for organisational and system change. The provision of explicit statements of learning intent, an educational process enabling acquisition and demonstration of these, and criteria for ensuring their achievement are the key features of such a framework. The derivation of an appropriate outcome set should emphasise what the learners will be able to do following the learning experience, how they will subsequently approach these tasks, and what, as a professional, they will bring to their practice. Once defined, the learning outcomes should determine, in turn, the nature of the learning experience enabling their achievement and the assessment processes to certify that they have been met. Provision of the necessary educational environment requires an understanding of the close interrelationship between learning style, learning theory, and methods whereby active and deep learning may be fostered. If desired change is to prevail, a conducive educational culture which values learning as well as evaluation, review, and enhancement must be engendered. It is the responsibility of all who teach to foster such an environment and culture, for all practitioners involved in health care have a leadership role in education.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700378      PMCID: PMC1765757          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100038..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  21 in total

1.  The adult learner: a mythical species.

Authors:  G R Norman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Do continuing professional development models promote one-dimensional learning?

Authors:  M Eraut
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Encouraging educational leadership

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice.

Authors:  L Southgate; M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

Review 5.  Leadership and the quality of care.

Authors:  J Firth-Cozens; D Mowbray
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

6.  Approaches to experiential learning, course delivery and validation in medicine. A background document.

Authors:  F Stanton; J Grant
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 7.  Problem-based learning: its rationale and efficacy.

Authors:  P M Finucane; S M Johnson; D J Prideaux
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1998-05-04       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  The need for more efficacy and relevance in medical education.

Authors:  P Chastonay; E Brenner; S Peel; F F Guilbert
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

10.  A primer on leading the improvement of systems.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Putting improvement at the heart of health care.

Authors:  Peter Wilcock; Antony Lewis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-28

2.  Developing a Workplace-Based Learning Culture in the NHS: Aspirations and Challenges.

Authors:  Suzanne Gawne; Rebecca Fish; Laura Machin
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-07-31

3.  Inter-professional in-situ simulated team and resuscitation training for patient safety: Description and impact of a programmatic approach.

Authors:  Katja Zimmermann; Iris Bachmann Holzinger; Lorena Ganassi; Peter Esslinger; Sina Pilgrim; Meredith Allen; Margarita Burmester; Martin Stocker
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Interdisciplinary integration of the CVS module and its effect on faculty and student satisfaction as well as student performance.

Authors:  Nasra N Ayuob; Basem S Eldeek; Lana A Alshawa; Abdulrahman F ALsaba
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.