Literature DB >> 26270073

Crowding in Visual Working Memory Reveals Its Spatial Resolution and the Nature of Its Representations.

Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau1, Anat R Fintzi2, René Marois2.   

Abstract

Spatial resolution fundamentally limits any image representation. Although this limit has been extensively investigated for perceptual representations by assessing how neighboring flankers degrade the perception of a peripheral target with visual crowding, the corresponding limit for representations held in visual working memory (VWM) is unknown. In the present study, we evoked crowding in VWM and directly compared resolution in VWM and perception. Remarkably, the spatial resolution of VWM proved to be no worse than that of perception. However, mixture modeling of errors caused by crowding revealed the qualitatively distinct nature of these representations. Perceptual crowding errors arose from both increased imprecision in target representations and substitution of flankers for targets. By contrast, VWM crowding errors arose exclusively from substitutions, which suggests that VWM transforms analog perceptual representations into discrete items. Thus, although perception and VWM share a common resolution limit, exceeding this limit reveals distinct mechanisms for perceiving images and holding them in mind.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perception; short-term memory; visual memory; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26270073      PMCID: PMC4567493          DOI: 10.1177/0956797615592394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  27 in total

1.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srividhya Hariharan; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Melanie Palomares; Najib J Majaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory?

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; Jonathan Gill; Aude Oliva; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-29

8.  Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; John T Serences; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  9 in total

1.  Set size effects on working memory precision are not due to an averaging of slots.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visual Memories Bypass Normalization.

Authors:  Ilona M Bloem; Yurika L Watanabe; Melissa M Kibbe; Sam Ling
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

4.  Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Jumana Ahmad; Garrett Swan; Howard Bowman; Brad Wyble; Anna C Nobre; Kimron L Shapiro; Fiona McNab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A major role for retrieval and/or comparison in the set-size effects of change detection.

Authors:  James C Moreland; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual Working Memory Is Independent of the Cortical Spacing Between Memoranda.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Limitations of concurrently representing objects within view and in visual working memory.

Authors:  Tengfei Liang; Zijian Cheng; Wenjing Hu; Chaoxiong Ye; Jiafeng Zhang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Excessive visual crowding effects in developmental dyscalculia.

Authors:  Elisa Castaldi; Marco Turi; Sahawanatou Gassama; Manuela Piazza; Evelyn Eger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Object-based selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Lin; Garry Kong; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.