Literature DB >> 11688368

Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.

N Steblay1, J Dysart, S Fulero, R C Lindsay.   

Abstract

Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior to viewing the next lineup member. The present work uses the technique of meta-analysis to compare the accuracy rates of these presentation styles. Twenty-three papers were located (9 published and 14 unpublished), providing 30 tests of the hypothesis and including 4,145 participants. Results showed that identification of perpetrators from target-present lineups occurs at a higher rate from simultaneous than from sequential lineups. However, this difference largely disappears when moderator variables approximating real world conditions are considered. Also, correct rejection rates were significantly higher for sequential than simultaneous lineups and this difference is maintained or increased by greater approximation to real world conditions. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11688368     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012888715007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  13 in total

1.  Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes; John C Dunn; Steven E Clark; William Wells
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis.

Authors:  Christian A Meissner; Colin G Tredoux; Janat F Parker; Otto H MacLin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

3.  Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

Review 4.  Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Ryan D Godfrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

5.  Why eyewitnesses fail.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.

Authors:  Nathalie Brackmann; Melanie Sauerland; Henry Otgaar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

7.  Identifying criminals: No biasing effect of criminal context on recalled threat.

Authors:  Terence J McElvaney; Magda Osman; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-13

8.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 9.  The neuroscience of memory: implications for the courtroom.

Authors:  Joyce W Lacy; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  US line-ups outperform UK line-ups.

Authors:  Travis M Seale-Carlisle; Laura Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.