Literature DB >> 30478519

Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.

Nathalie Brackmann1,2,3, Melanie Sauerland4, Henry Otgaar4,5.   

Abstract

We tested developmental trends in eyewitness identification in biased and unbiased lineups. Our main interest was adolescent's lineup performance compared with children and adults. 7-10-year-olds, 11-13-year-olds, 14-16-year-olds, and adults (N = 431) watched a wallet-theft-video and subsequently identified the thief, victim, and witness from simultaneous target-present and target-absent six-person photo lineups. The thief-absent lineup included a bystander previously seen in thief proximity. Research on unconscious transference suggested a selection bias toward the bystander in adults and 11-13-year-olds, but not in younger children. Confirming our hypothesis, adolescents were more prone to bystander bias than all other age groups. This may be due to adolescents making more inferential errors than children, as predicted by fuzzy-trace theory and associative-activation theory, combined with lower inhibition control in adolescents compared with adults. We also replicated a clothing bias for all age groups and age-related performance differences in our unbiased lineups. Consistent with previous findings, participants were generally overconfident in their decisions, even though confidence was a better predictor of accuracy in older compared with younger participants. With this study, we show that adolescents have an increased tendency to misidentify an innocent bystander. Continued efforts are needed to disentangle how adolescents in comparison to other age groups perform in forensically relevant situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent witnesses; Child witnesses; Clothing bias; Confidence–accuracy relationship; Identification performance; Unconscious transference

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30478519     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

Review 1.  The suggestibility of children's memory.

Authors:  M Bruck; S J Ceci
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference.

Authors:  Kenneth A Deffenbacher; Brian H Bornstein; Steven D Penrod
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2006-06

3.  Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.

Authors:  Melanie Sauerland; Siegfried L Sporer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control.

Authors:  Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; Sabine Peters; Barbara R Braams; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.

Authors:  Ryan J Fitzgerald; Heather L Price
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J D Pozzulo; R C Lindsay
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1998-10

Review 7.  Developmental reversals in false memory: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; S J Ceci
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance.

Authors:  Melanie Sauerland; Linsey H C Raymaekers; Henry Otgaar; Amina Memon; Thijs T Waltjen; Maud Nivo; Chiel Slegers; Nick J Broers; Tom Smeets
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2016-07-15

9.  Adolescents display distinctive tolerance to ambiguity and to uncertainty during risky decision making.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions.

Authors:  Henry Otgaar; Mark L Howe; Nathalie Brackmann; Tom Smeets
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Line-Up Image Position in Simultaneous and Sequential Line-Ups: The Effects of Age and Viewing Distance on Selection Patterns.

Authors:  Thomas J Nyman; Jan Antfolk; James Michael Lampinen; Julia Korkman; Pekka Santtila
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice.

Authors:  Madeleine E Moses-Payne; Johanna Habicht; Aislinn Bowler; Nikolaus Steinbeis; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  Time-of-day effects on eyewitness reports in morning and evening types.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2022-03-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.