Literature DB >> 28739937

Why eyewitnesses fail.

Thomas D Albright1.   

Abstract

Eyewitness identifications play an important role in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, but it is well known that eyewitnesses make mistakes, often with serious consequences. In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current practice and use of eyewitness testimony, with an eye toward understanding why identification errors occur and what can be done to prevent them. The work of this committee led to key findings and recommendations for reform, detailed in a consensus report entitled Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification In this review, I focus on the scientific issues that emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommendations for additional research, best practices for law enforcement, and use of eyewitness evidence by the courts.

Keywords:  criminal justice; forensic science; lineup; memory; visual perception

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739937      PMCID: PMC5544328          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

Review 1.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.

Authors:  Matthew A Palmer; Neil Brewer
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2012-06

3.  Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes; John C Dunn; Steven E Clark; William Wells
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Reconsolidation: the advantage of being refocused.

Authors:  Yadin Dudai
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Perception and motivation in face recognition: a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect.

Authors:  Steven G Young; Kurt Hugenberg; Michael J Bernstein; Donald F Sacco
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 6.  The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Gary L Wells
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2017-03-22

7.  Recognition for faces of own and other race.

Authors:  R S Malpass; J Kravitz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1969-12

8.  A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.

Authors:  Kenneth A Deffenbacher; Brian H Bornstein; Steven D Penrod; E Kiernan McGorty
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2004-12

Review 9.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Random generalized linear model: a highly accurate and interpretable ensemble predictor.

Authors:  Lin Song; Peter Langfelder; Steve Horvath
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identifying criminals: No biasing effect of criminal context on recalled threat.

Authors:  Terence J McElvaney; Magda Osman; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-13

2.  Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.

Authors:  John M Pearson; Jonathan R Law; Jesse A G Skene; Donald H Beskind; Neil Vidmar; David A Ball; Artemis Malekpour; R McKell Carter; J H Pate Skene
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  Scientific Thinking About Legal Truth.

Authors:  Gal Rosenzweig
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.