Literature DB >> 11682309

What controls the length of noncoding DNA?

J M Comeron1.   

Abstract

Several recent studies of genome evolution indicate that the rate of DNA loss exceeds that of DNA gain, leading to an underlying mutational pressure towards collapsing the length of noncoding DNA. That such a collapse is not observed suggests opposing mechanisms favoring longer noncoding regions. The presence of transposable elements alone also does not explain observed features of noncoding DNA. At present, a multidisciplinary approach--using population genetics techniques, large-scale genomic analyses, and in silico evolution--is beginning to provide new and valuable insights into the forces that shape the length of noncoding DNA and, ultimately, genome size. Recombination, in a broad sense, might be the missing key parameter for understanding the observed variation in length of noncoding DNA in eukaryotes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11682309     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00249-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev        ISSN: 0959-437X            Impact factor:   5.578


  21 in total

1.  Congruent evolution of different classes of non-coding DNA in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Igor B Rogozin; Kira S Makarova; Darren A Natale; Alexey N Spiridonov; Roman L Tatusov; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie Yin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Perfectly complementary nucleic acid enzymes.

Authors:  Scott T Kuhns; Gerald F Joyce
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Genome size variation and evolution in Veronica.

Authors:  Dirk C Albach; J Greilhuber
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Pierre Nouvellet; Peter D Keightley; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome size and chromatin condensation in vertebrates.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Conserved Critical Evolutionary Gene Structures in Orthologs.

Authors:  Miguel A Fuertes; José R Rodrigo; Carlos Alonso
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus.

Authors:  You S Rao; Zhang F Wang; Xue W Chai; Guo Z Wu; Ming Zhou; Qing H Nie; Xi Q Zhang
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Genome-wide analysis of conservation and divergence of microsatellites in rice.

Authors:  Manish Roorkiwal; Atul Grover; Prakash C Sharma
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Long repeats in a huge genome: microsatellite loci in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  Jana Ustinova; Roland Achmann; Sylvia Cremer; Frieder Mayer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Genome analysis and strain comparison of correia repeats and correia repeat-enclosed elements in pathogenic Neisseria.

Authors:  Shi V Liu; Nigel J Saunders; Alex Jeffries; Richard F Rest
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.