Literature DB >> 11669245

Dynamic behavior of implants as a measure of osseointegration.

L C Ramp1, R L Jeffcoat.   

Abstract

Research into the formation, destruction, and adaptation of bone around implants would benefit from a sensitive, nondestructive, noninvasive, and quantitative technique to assess the bone-implant interface. It is hypothesized that osseointegration can be quantified by sensing the mechanical impedance (or micromobility) of the implant when it is subjected to minute vibratory forces superimposed upon a quasi-static preload. To test this hypothesis, a total of 24 identical threaded, titanium root-form implants (10 x 3.75 mm, Osteo-Implant, New Castle, PA) were placed in the mandibles of 4 Walker hounds and allowed to heal submerged for 3 months. The implants were exposed and characterized for osseointegration using clinical observations, quantitative radiography, and a custom-designed impedance instrument. Subsequently, arbitrarily selected implants were ligated to induce bone loss and examined monthly over a 6-month study period. Following the terminal examination and euthanasia, quantitative histologic measurements were made of bone adjacent to the implant, including estimates of both crestal bone height and the percent bone (bone fraction). Linearized dynamic parameters (effective stiffness and effective damping) correlated well with radiographic and histologic measures of bony support (r2 values ranged from 0.70 to 0.89). Moreover, the presence of nonlinear stiffness was clearly associated with a bimodal "clinical impression" of osseointegration (P < .0003, 1-way analysis of variance). These results confirm that, in this animal model, mechanical impedance can be used as a measure of implant osseointegration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11669245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Functional apparent moduli as predictors of oral implant osseointegration dynamics.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Noboru Kikuchi; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Comparison of implant stability before prosthetic loading of two dental implant systems.

Authors:  Sanjay Balaji Lagdive; Sushma Sanjay Lagdive
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

3.  Biological evaluation and finite-element modeling of porous poly(para-phenylene) for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Hyunhee Ahn; Ravi R Patel; Anthony J Hoyt; Angela S P Lin; F Brennan Torstrick; Robert E Guldberg; Carl P Frick; R Dana Carpenter; Christopher M Yakacki; Nick J Willett
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Determination of the dynamics of healing at the tissue-implant interface by means of microcomputed tomography and functional apparent moduli.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Bone Ring Augmentation Around Immediate Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Girish B Giraddi; Aamir Malick Saifi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

7.  PDGF-B gene therapy accelerates bone engineering and oral implant osseointegration.

Authors:  P-C Chang; Y-J Seol; J A Cirelli; G Pellegrini; Q Jin; L M Franco; S A Goldstein; L A Chandler; B Sosnowski; W V Giannobile
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Evaluation of the effects of different sand particles that used in dental implant roughened for osseointegration.

Authors:  Mehmet Emre Yurttutan; Ahmet Keskin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.